Is manipulation of mediastinal chest drains useful or harmful after cardiac surgery?

医学 挤奶 外科 心脏外科 心胸外科 排水 灌注 心脏病学 生态学 生物 历史 考古
作者
Thomas G. Day,Roslyn R. Perring,Katy Gofton
出处
期刊:Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:7 (5): 878-890 被引量:39
标识
DOI:10.1510/icvts.2008.185413
摘要

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: in patients who have undergone cardiothoracic surgery does manipulation of drainage tubes affect drainage volumes or post-surgical outcome? Altogether 681 papers were found using the reported search, of which four represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. Duncan and Erickson in 1982 found that chest tube stripping can lead to very low negative intrathoracic pressures. The authors report that this has the potential to cause tissue injury. Issacson et al. in 1986 compared two different methods of drain manipulation. They found no significant differences in the milking and stripping methods, suggesting that they are of similar efficacy in enhancing drainage. Lim-Levy et al. in 1986 also compared milking vs. stripping, with a control group that received no manipulation. They found no significant differences between the three groups in drainage volume. Furthermore, they recorded no incidences of tube occlusion in any of the three groups, implying that leaving the drains free of manipulation is acceptable in terms of clot clearance in the majority of patients. The milking and stripping methods were also compared by Pierce et al. in 1991. They also found no significant differences between the two manipulation methods. The studies by Issacson et al., Lim-Levy et al., and Pierce et al. were included in a Cochrane systematic review by Wallen et al. in 2002. No other relevant studies other than the three mentioned above were found after an extensive search of the literature. Overall, the authors concluded that there was insufficient evidence to recommend one type of drain manipulation technique over another, or to support or refute the need for drain manipulation at all. In our paper the authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. We conclude that due to possible tissue damage and lack of demonstrable benefit, in most patients drainage tube manipulation should not be performed. No differences in either safety or efficacy have been demonstrated between the milking and stripping methods of manipulation.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
快乐战神没烦恼完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
花海发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
赘婿应助霍斯靖采纳,获得10
3秒前
Wone3发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
淡淡向卉完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
公子渔发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
沉默的倔驴应助自信书竹采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
顺利曼香发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
小恐龙发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
丘比特应助aaa采纳,获得10
10秒前
Lucas应助晨晨采纳,获得50
12秒前
Freya完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
英俊的铭应助Lzzy采纳,获得10
16秒前
Anatocism完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
Hello应助刘刘刘医生采纳,获得10
18秒前
18秒前
认真不可完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
大模型应助顺利曼香采纳,获得10
19秒前
20秒前
20秒前
伍陆伍陆两完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
蓬莱第几宫完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
李健的小迷弟应助NE采纳,获得10
21秒前
21秒前
隐形曼青应助yun采纳,获得10
22秒前
22秒前
aaa发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
24秒前
Silvia发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
24秒前
霍斯靖发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
圆圆发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
keep完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
30秒前
Ava应助雇凶暗杀蛋饺采纳,获得10
31秒前
功夫熊猫完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
月光下的守望者完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane Insecta, Polyneoptera 2000
Emmy Noether's Wonderful Theorem 1200
Leading Academic-Practice Partnerships in Nursing and Healthcare: A Paradigm for Change 800
基于非线性光纤环形镜的全保偏锁模激光器研究-上海科技大学 800
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Wade & Forsyth's Administrative Law 550
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6410225
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8229577
关于积分的说明 17461676
捐赠科研通 5463343
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2886717
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1863134
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1702351