Is manipulation of mediastinal chest drains useful or harmful after cardiac surgery?

医学 挤奶 外科 心脏外科 心胸外科 排水 灌注 心脏病学 生态学 生物 历史 考古
作者
Thomas G. Day,Roslyn R. Perring,Katy Gofton
出处
期刊:Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:7 (5): 878-890 被引量:39
标识
DOI:10.1510/icvts.2008.185413
摘要

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: in patients who have undergone cardiothoracic surgery does manipulation of drainage tubes affect drainage volumes or post-surgical outcome? Altogether 681 papers were found using the reported search, of which four represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. Duncan and Erickson in 1982 found that chest tube stripping can lead to very low negative intrathoracic pressures. The authors report that this has the potential to cause tissue injury. Issacson et al. in 1986 compared two different methods of drain manipulation. They found no significant differences in the milking and stripping methods, suggesting that they are of similar efficacy in enhancing drainage. Lim-Levy et al. in 1986 also compared milking vs. stripping, with a control group that received no manipulation. They found no significant differences between the three groups in drainage volume. Furthermore, they recorded no incidences of tube occlusion in any of the three groups, implying that leaving the drains free of manipulation is acceptable in terms of clot clearance in the majority of patients. The milking and stripping methods were also compared by Pierce et al. in 1991. They also found no significant differences between the two manipulation methods. The studies by Issacson et al., Lim-Levy et al., and Pierce et al. were included in a Cochrane systematic review by Wallen et al. in 2002. No other relevant studies other than the three mentioned above were found after an extensive search of the literature. Overall, the authors concluded that there was insufficient evidence to recommend one type of drain manipulation technique over another, or to support or refute the need for drain manipulation at all. In our paper the authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. We conclude that due to possible tissue damage and lack of demonstrable benefit, in most patients drainage tube manipulation should not be performed. No differences in either safety or efficacy have been demonstrated between the milking and stripping methods of manipulation.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
1秒前
小桔青山完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
社牛小柯完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
青己完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
多花基因完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
希望天下0贩的0应助大道采纳,获得10
3秒前
情怀应助sunlulu采纳,获得10
4秒前
小周完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
葛藟萦藤完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
hhrr发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
HM发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
禽兽琦完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
牧青发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
Criminology34应助dgqz采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
旦皋完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
科研girl应助星芒采纳,获得10
12秒前
汉堡包应助87采纳,获得10
13秒前
刘贺完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
体贴寒烟发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
灵巧的雨灵完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
桐桐应助想毕业了采纳,获得10
13秒前
w1kend完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
将个烂就发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
16秒前
酷波er应助qq78910采纳,获得10
17秒前
17秒前
17秒前
无极微光应助Sakura采纳,获得20
17秒前
Eternitymaria完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
淡淡夕阳发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
李健应助苏汇筎采纳,获得10
21秒前
21秒前
刘贺发布了新的文献求助20
21秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane Insecta, Polyneoptera 2000
The politics of sentencing reform in the context of U.S. mass incarceration 1000
基于非线性光纤环形镜的全保偏锁模激光器研究-上海科技大学 800
Pulse width control of a 3-phase inverter with non sinusoidal phase voltages 777
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Research Methods for Applied Linguistics: A Practical Guide 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6408271
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8227456
关于积分的说明 17452259
捐赠科研通 5461305
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2885946
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1862381
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1702018