人际反应指数
心理学
无血性
移情
验证性因素分析
收敛有效性
认知
探索性因素分析
个人痛苦
临床心理学
心理测量学
比例(比率)
内部一致性
测试有效性
判别效度
可靠性(半导体)
发展心理学
透视法
样品(材料)
移情关怀
人际交往
中国人
结构效度
透视图(图形)
社会认知
项目分析
社会认知
感知
有效性
相关性
作者
Yun‐si Liang,Han‐xue Yang,Yantao Ma,Simon S. Y. Lui,Eric Cheung,Yi Wang,Raymond C. K. Chan
出处
期刊:PsyCh journal
[Wiley]
日期:2019-04-15
卷期号:8 (4): 439-448
被引量:45
摘要
Abstract The Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy (QCAE) is a commonly used instrument in empathy research. However, this scale has not been validated in the Chinese context. We examined the psychometric properties and structure of the QCAE in a Chinese sample consisting of 1224 college students. The whole sample was split into two halves for exploratory factor analysis (EFA; n = 617) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA; n = 607). A subsample ( n = 351) completed the Chinese versions of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) to examine convergent validity and the Revised Social Anhedonia Scale (RSAS) to examine the discriminate validity. Finally, 79 participants of the above subsample were retested after a 4‐week interval. Results from EFA and CFA suggested a five‐factor model, namely Perspective Taking, Online Simulation, Emotional Contagion, Proximal Responsivity, and Peripheral Responsivity. The internal consistency was .86 and test–retest reliability was .76. Scores on the QCAE positively correlated with scores on the IRI and negatively correlated with scores on the RSAS. The Chinese version of the QCAE exhibited good factor structure, reliability, and validity. Specific relationships between empathy and social anhedonia were also demonstrated.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI