摘要
Responsible RememberingHow Metacognition Impacts Adaptive Selective MemoryDillon H. Murphy and Alan D. CastelDillon H. Murphy Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, CA, USA Search for more papers by this author and Alan D. Castel Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, CA, USA Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:October 30, 2020https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000428PDFView Full Text ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInReddit SectionsMoreReferences Ariel, R., Dunlosky, J., & Bailey, H. (2009). Agenda-based regulation of study-time allocation: When agendas override item-based monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 432–447. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015928 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Besken, M., & Mulligan, N. W. (2013). Easily perceived, easily remembered? Perceptual interference produces a double dissociation between metamemory and memory performance. Memory & Cognition, 41(6), 897–903. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-013-0307-8 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Castel, A. D., McGillivray, S., & Friedman, M. C. (2012). Metamemory and memory efficiency in older adults: Learning about the benefits of priority processing and value-directed remembering. In M. Naveh-BenjaminN. OhtaEds., Memory and aging: Current issues and future directions (pp. 245–270). Psychology Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Fantz, A. (2015, January). After leaving a child in the car, “that pain never goes away”. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2014/07/03/us/hot-car-deaths/index.html First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Friedman, M. C., McGillivray, S., Murayama, K., & Castel, A. D. (2015). Memory for medication side effects in younger and older adults: The role of subjective and objective importance. Memory & Cognition, 43(2), 206–215. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0476-0 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Halamish, V., McGillivray, S., & Castel, A. D. (2011). Monitoring one’s own forgetting in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 26(3), 631–635. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022852 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Hargis, M. B., & Castel, A. D. (2018). Younger and older adults’ associative memory for medication interactions of varying severity. Memory, 26(8), 1151–1158. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2018.1441423 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Hargis, M. B., & Castel, A. D. (2019). Knowing what others know: Younger and older adults’ perspective-taking and memory for medication information. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(8), 481–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.09.004 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Hertzog, C., & Dunlosky, J. (2011). Metacognition in later adulthood: Spared monitoring can benefit older adults’ self-regulation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(3), 167–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411409026 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Koriat, A., Bjork, R. A., Sheffer, L., & Bar, S. K. (2004). Predicting one’s own forgetting: The role of experience-based and theory-based processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(4), 643–656. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.4.643 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Kornell, N., Rhodes, M. G., Castel, A. D., & Tauber, S. K. (2011). The ease of processing heuristic and the stability bias: Dissociating memory, memory beliefs, and memory judgments. Psychological Science, 22(6), 787–794. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611407929 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Mata, R., Schooler, L. J., & Rieskamp, J. (2007). The aging decision maker: Cognitive aging and the adaptive selection of decision strategies. Psychology and Aging, 22(4), 796–810. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.22.4.796 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar McGillivray, S., & Castel, A. D. (2011). Betting on memory leads to metacognitive improvement in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 26(1), 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022681 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Middlebrooks, C. D., McGillivray, S., Murayama, K., & Castel, A. D. (2016). Memory for allergies and health foods: How younger and older adults strategically remember critical health information. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 71(3), 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbv032 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Mueller, M. L., & Dunlosky, J. (2016). How beliefs can impact judgments of learning: Evaluating analytic processing theory with beliefs about fluency. Journal of Memory and Language, 93, 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.10.008 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Queen, T. L., Hess, T. M., Ennis, G. E., Dowd, K., & Grühn, D. (2012). Information search and decision making: Effects of age and complexity on strategy use. Psychology and Aging, 27(4), 817–824. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028744 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Rhodes, M. G. (2016). Judgments of learning. In J. DunloskyS. K. TauberEds., The Oxford handbook of metamemory (pp. 65–80). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199336746.013.4 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Rhodes, M. G., & Castel, A. D. (2008). Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: Evidence for metacognitive illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(4), 615–625. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013684 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Rhodes, M. G., & Castel, A. D. (2009). Metacognitive illusions for auditory information: Effects on monitoring and control. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(3), 550–554. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.3.550 First citation in articleGoogle Scholar Undorf, M., & Bröder, A. (2019). Cue integration in metamemory judgments is strategic. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(4), 629–642. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819882308 First citation in articleGoogle ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byAccuracy, Causes, and Consequences of Monitoring One’s Own Learning and MemoryVered Halamish and Monika Undorf14 April 2021 | Zeitschrift für Psychologie, Vol. 229, No. 2New Methods and Questions in Metamemory ResearchMonika Undorf and Vered Halamish30 October 2020 | Zeitschrift für Psychologie, Vol. 228, No. 4 Topical Issue: New Directions in Metamemory ResearchVolume 228Issue 4October 2020ISSN: 2190-8370eISSN: 2151-2604 ReceivedJanuary 14, 2020RevisedMarch 19, 2020AcceptedMarch 19, 2020Published onlineOctober 30, 2020 InformationZeitschrift für Psychologie (2020), 228, pp. 301-303 https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000428.© 2020Hogrefe PublishingPDF download