观察研究
痴呆
心理信息
疾病
神经认知
混淆
医学
精神科
失智症
心理学
临床心理学
梅德林
认知
内科学
法学
政治学
作者
Shaun Hiu,Tingting Yong,M. Dawn Teare,John‐Paul Taylor
摘要
Abstract Background Instrumental variable (IV) analysis is a methodology used to study causal effects of treatments or exposures. If properly implemented, causal effects can be estimated even in the presence of unmeasured confounding. . Central to IV analysis is the identification of a valid instrument that satisfies three assumptions – one is empirically verifiable (Restriction) but the remainder require substantive knowledge and convincing argumentation (Exclusion restriction and Exchangeability). The objective of this study is to systematically review the strategies used to validate an IV in observational studies of dementia and neurodegenerative disease. This systematic review is pertinent given the increasing use of real‐world evidence to guide public health and regulatory decision‐making in lieu of randomised controlled trials. Methods We conducted our search using PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. We included published observational studies investigating the causal effect of some risk factor, exposure, or treatment using IV analysis and using either a sample of: i) adults without diagnosis of dementia or neurodegenerative disease and an outcome of incident diagnosis of dementia or neurodegenerative disease; or ii) adult patients diagnosed with dementia, major neurocognitive disorder, or neurodegenerative disease and a clinical outcome related to incident dementia, mortality, hospitalisation, institutionalisation, serious adverse outcomes, medication adherence, cognition, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and biomarkers of neurodegeneration. We will extract and categorise text information directly arguing for the assumptions of a valid IV and the type(s) of falsification tests used. Results 927 unique articles were retrieved. Screening for eligibility and data extraction by two study authors are currently underway. Results will be presented at the conference. Conclusions Reviewing how variables have been reasoned to be valid IVs may help improve our understanding of the causal effects of treatments or exposures on dementia and neurodegenerative disease which may have relevance in shaping future therapeutic and management approaches.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI