Systematic review of strategies to justify validity of instrumental variables in observational studies of dementia and neurodegenerative disease

观察研究 痴呆 心理信息 疾病 神经认知 混淆 医学 精神科 失智症 心理学 临床心理学 梅德林 认知 内科学 政治学 法学
作者
Shaun Hiu,Tingting Yong,M. Dawn Teare,John‐Paul Taylor
出处
期刊:Alzheimers & Dementia [Wiley]
卷期号:19 (S22)
标识
DOI:10.1002/alz.073290
摘要

Abstract Background Instrumental variable (IV) analysis is a methodology used to study causal effects of treatments or exposures. If properly implemented, causal effects can be estimated even in the presence of unmeasured confounding. . Central to IV analysis is the identification of a valid instrument that satisfies three assumptions – one is empirically verifiable (Restriction) but the remainder require substantive knowledge and convincing argumentation (Exclusion restriction and Exchangeability). The objective of this study is to systematically review the strategies used to validate an IV in observational studies of dementia and neurodegenerative disease. This systematic review is pertinent given the increasing use of real‐world evidence to guide public health and regulatory decision‐making in lieu of randomised controlled trials. Methods We conducted our search using PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. We included published observational studies investigating the causal effect of some risk factor, exposure, or treatment using IV analysis and using either a sample of: i) adults without diagnosis of dementia or neurodegenerative disease and an outcome of incident diagnosis of dementia or neurodegenerative disease; or ii) adult patients diagnosed with dementia, major neurocognitive disorder, or neurodegenerative disease and a clinical outcome related to incident dementia, mortality, hospitalisation, institutionalisation, serious adverse outcomes, medication adherence, cognition, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and biomarkers of neurodegeneration. We will extract and categorise text information directly arguing for the assumptions of a valid IV and the type(s) of falsification tests used. Results 927 unique articles were retrieved. Screening for eligibility and data extraction by two study authors are currently underway. Results will be presented at the conference. Conclusions Reviewing how variables have been reasoned to be valid IVs may help improve our understanding of the causal effects of treatments or exposures on dementia and neurodegenerative disease which may have relevance in shaping future therapeutic and management approaches.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
冷静新烟发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
1秒前
xiaoyi发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
赘婿应助殷勤的雨灵采纳,获得10
2秒前
lsl完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
胖莹完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
9秒前
11秒前
keyanxiaoliu完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
活泼的龙猫完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
Orange应助布吉岛呀采纳,获得10
13秒前
orixero应助hahahaha采纳,获得10
15秒前
MC123完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
17秒前
18秒前
19秒前
19秒前
zhanghaonan完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
Li发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
斯文败类应助小南子采纳,获得10
22秒前
李健应助哭泣嵩采纳,获得10
22秒前
我是老大应助洗心采纳,获得10
22秒前
zhanghaonan发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
molihuakai应助高高行云采纳,获得10
23秒前
25秒前
冬冬发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
26秒前
ru发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
思源应助小熊猫采纳,获得10
27秒前
28秒前
29秒前
30秒前
IM关闭了IM文献求助
30秒前
30秒前
小南子完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
30秒前
风之子发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
A Research Agenda for Law, Finance and the Environment 800
Development Across Adulthood 800
Chemistry and Physics of Carbon Volume 18 800
The Organometallic Chemistry of the Transition Metals 800
A Time to Mourn, A Time to Dance: The Expression of Grief and Joy in Israelite Religion 700
The formation of Australian attitudes towards China, 1918-1941 640
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6448238
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8261327
关于积分的说明 17600116
捐赠科研通 5510384
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2902599
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1879630
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1720477