Associations Between Interruptions and Medication Administration Errors Among Nurses in Hospital Settings: A Scoping Review of Quantitative Studies

奇纳 数据提取 斯科普斯 医学 梅德林 家庭医学 护理部 心理干预 政治学 法学
作者
Ginger Schroers,Elizabeth Huggins,Farzan Sasangohar,Jenny O’Rourke
出处
期刊:Journal of Advanced Nursing [Wiley]
标识
DOI:10.1111/jan.70032
摘要

ABSTRACT Aim To provide an overview of quantitative research studies that report inferential statistics on the associations between interruptions and medication administration errors among nurses in hospital settings. Design A scoping review guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. Methods Quantitative research studies conducted among nurses in hospital settings and published in English were sought. Covidence software was used by two authors to independently screen titles, abstracts, and full‐text articles. Two authors performed an independent data extraction using a standardised extraction template. Data Sources Ovid Medline, EMBASE (Elsevier), CINAHL (EBSCOHost), Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched from the database inception through October 2024. Citation searching was also used to locate relevant studies. Results Twenty‐two studies met the review criteria. Studies were conducted in nine different countries, often in more than one hospital, and in various nursing units. Definitions of interruption and medication administration error frequently differed across studies or were not provided. Data were collected via direct observation, self‐report survey, a combination of direct observation and self‐report, or retrospective review of records. Most ( n = 16; 73%) studies reported a statistically significant positive association between interruptions and medication administration errors. Conclusion Globally, interruptions are prevalent during nurse medication administration, and a majority of studies report a positive association between interruptions and medication administration errors. Continued investigation of this association using standard definitions of interruption and medication administration error, as well as consistent methods, is needed to strengthen research in this area. Implications The findings from this review can be used to inform future primary research, potential systematic reviews, and the development of targeted interventions to enhance medication safety and nursing practice in hospital environments worldwide. Reporting Method Reporting was guided by Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review method and the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews. Patient or Public Contribution No patient or public contributions were made to this scoping review.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Danielle完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
漾漾发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
1秒前
2秒前
传奇3应助一只小羔羊采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
kk完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
lll发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
3秒前
shancui发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
YANG发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
周艳鸿发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
我是老大应助小王采纳,获得10
4秒前
丘比特应助Lin_sandwich采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
Hannah完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
怕黑剑身发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
五柳后生发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
泥鳅不是鱼完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
隐形曼青应助Kem采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
朵拉发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
10秒前
林子发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
程浩发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
DYF发布了新的文献求助20
10秒前
慕青应助机灵小熊猫采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
DDd完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
老实凝蕊发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
GUSHIYAO发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
11秒前
Darline完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The anomeric effect 1000
Principles of town planning: translating concepts to applications 1000
1 Peter and Christ's Descent to the Dead in Its Early Christian Reception 700
Nature-Inspired Computing: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications 600
Perfectionism in School 600
Organizational Behavior 510
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7729943
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9281896
关于积分的说明 20145945
捐赠科研通 7307358
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3303343
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2456188
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2311754