Cost-Effective Analysis of Different Diagnostic Strategies in Screening for Aneurysms After Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Purpose With an increasing number of patients being treated by coiling for aneurysms, using computed tomographic angiography (CTA) or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) as an initial screening test becomes less important because digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the first step of endovascular treatment procedure. The objective of this study is to investigate whether CTA or MRA remained to be the optimal screening strategy in patients with spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Methods CTA, MRA, and DSA strategy were evaluated in a decision tree model created with TreeAge Pro Suite 2011. Input parameters were derived from published literature and our institutional database. Base case and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the cost-effectiveness of each strategy. A Monte Carlo simulation was performed with all parameters ranged among their distributions to evaluate the validation of results. Results The base case scenario showed that MRA was the most cost-effective strategy. Using a willingness-to-pay threshold of ¥70,892/quality adjusted life year, MRA remained to be most cost-effective when its sensitivity is >0.907. DSA was not cost-effective compared to CTA or MRA unless over 91.56% of patients were treated by coiling. The Monte Carlo simulation reported DSA not to be a cost-effective strategy at willingness-to-pay of ¥70,892 in 99.99% of the iterations. Conclusion DSA is not cost-effective compared to CTA or MRA and should not be used as the initial diagnostic tool for spontaneous SAH.