Exploring Terms Used for the Oldest Old in the Gerontological Literature

老年护理学 心理学 老年学 医学 护理部
作者
Angela Kydd,Anne Fleming,Isabella Paoletti,Simona Hvalič‐Touzery
出处
期刊:The journal of aging and social change [Common Ground Research Networks]
卷期号:10 (2): 53-73 被引量:31
标识
DOI:10.18848/2576-5310/cgp/v10i02/53-73
摘要

Background: In response to the global increasing age of the population, there is general agreement on the need to define what is meant by "old."Yet there is no consensus on age groups within the definition of old, which makes comparative studies of people of differing ages in advancing years impossible.Attempts to sub-categorize the "old" also show little consensus.This article serves to open a dialogue, as an illustrative example of these inconsistencies.Aim: To examine definitions of the "oldest old" and "fourth age" in order to highlight such inconsistencies and the need for consistent age stratifications.Method: The authors conducted a literature search from January 2003 to April 2015 using the six top-most-rated non-medical journals in gerontology and again in 2018-2019 to give currency to the article.Results: Forty-nine articles in total were reviewed.The findings show little consensus on the age stratifications used to define the "oldest old" and "fourth age," which ranged from seventy-five plus to ninety-two plus years.Conclusion: Dividing the "old" population into the oldest old and/or fourth age still shows a lack of consensus, with some authors suggesting that such divisions have only served to move ageism into very old age.Recommendation: There are terms for ten-year cohorts, which if universally used, will mean that comparative ageing studies are possible, which in turn will inform international and national strategy documents, policy initiatives, clinical guidelines, and service provision design.Implications for Practice: Given the growth in the numbers of people classed as old and the time span being "old" covers, there is a real need for consensus.Definite age groupings that define people as cohorts, with existing and agreed words-such as sexagenarians (60-69,) septuagenarians (70-79), octogenarians (80-89), etc., will completely remove the need for the value-laden term "old" (and all its derivatives) for this poorly defined population.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
三十六完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
姜姜发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
2秒前
orixero应助xttawy采纳,获得10
3秒前
来了完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Lu发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
称心芷巧完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
超级幼旋发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
sankanf发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
huangjs发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
7秒前
共享精神应助Mocha采纳,获得10
7秒前
神帅酷哥完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
神勇芷巧发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
8秒前
还单身的老虎完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
美好斓发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
bkagyin应助如何让人采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
啄木鸟发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
赘婿应助daigang采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
lexiao完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
CQD5201314发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
无归发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
Bonnienuit发布了新的文献求助50
15秒前
pluto应助墨行采纳,获得10
16秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
Prescott's Microbiology: 2026 Release ISE 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Environmental Leverage in Times of Climate Crisis: Product Standards, Carbon Border Measures and Preferential Trade Agreements 1000
Interactions of Vowel Quality and Prosody in East Slavic 1000
Erwählung und Berufung bei Paulus: Bedeutung, Entwicklung und Funktion einer Vorstellung in ihrem frühjüdischen und griechisch-römischen Kontext 850
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7192670
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8829112
关于积分的说明 18640812
捐赠科研通 6828294
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3175838
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2327843
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2150296