Exploring Terms Used for the Oldest Old in the Gerontological Literature

老年护理学 心理学 老年学 医学 护理部
作者
Angela Kydd,Anne Fleming,Isabella Paoletti,Simona Hvalič‐Touzery
出处
期刊:The journal of aging and social change [Common Ground Research Networks]
卷期号:10 (2): 53-73 被引量:31
标识
DOI:10.18848/2576-5310/cgp/v10i02/53-73
摘要

Background: In response to the global increasing age of the population, there is general agreement on the need to define what is meant by "old."Yet there is no consensus on age groups within the definition of old, which makes comparative studies of people of differing ages in advancing years impossible.Attempts to sub-categorize the "old" also show little consensus.This article serves to open a dialogue, as an illustrative example of these inconsistencies.Aim: To examine definitions of the "oldest old" and "fourth age" in order to highlight such inconsistencies and the need for consistent age stratifications.Method: The authors conducted a literature search from January 2003 to April 2015 using the six top-most-rated non-medical journals in gerontology and again in 2018-2019 to give currency to the article.Results: Forty-nine articles in total were reviewed.The findings show little consensus on the age stratifications used to define the "oldest old" and "fourth age," which ranged from seventy-five plus to ninety-two plus years.Conclusion: Dividing the "old" population into the oldest old and/or fourth age still shows a lack of consensus, with some authors suggesting that such divisions have only served to move ageism into very old age.Recommendation: There are terms for ten-year cohorts, which if universally used, will mean that comparative ageing studies are possible, which in turn will inform international and national strategy documents, policy initiatives, clinical guidelines, and service provision design.Implications for Practice: Given the growth in the numbers of people classed as old and the time span being "old" covers, there is a real need for consensus.Definite age groupings that define people as cohorts, with existing and agreed words-such as sexagenarians (60-69,) septuagenarians (70-79), octogenarians (80-89), etc., will completely remove the need for the value-laden term "old" (and all its derivatives) for this poorly defined population.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
科研通AI6.3应助Sci采纳,获得10
刚刚
田様应助和谐的冷亦采纳,获得50
刚刚
刚刚
2秒前
ding应助suer采纳,获得10
2秒前
火山完成签到 ,获得积分0
3秒前
3秒前
3秒前
芒果椰椰发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
33LL完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
完美世界应助刘文辉采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
研友_EZ1aNZ完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
bkagyin应助cby采纳,获得10
6秒前
英俊的铭应助体贴的手链采纳,获得10
6秒前
加油女王发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
NexusExplorer应助shengch0234采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
咿咿呀呀发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
we发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
Akim应助飞天817采纳,获得10
11秒前
12秒前
pluto应助细腻戒指采纳,获得10
12秒前
扯不开的封口膜完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
科研通AI6.2应助酷酷平凡采纳,获得10
13秒前
14秒前
14秒前
传奇3应助a成采纳,获得10
14秒前
青枫完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
斯文败类应助Alex采纳,获得10
15秒前
孟龙威完成签到,获得积分20
16秒前
16秒前
16秒前
16秒前
星辰大海应助zdseu采纳,获得10
17秒前
17秒前
阳炎发布了新的文献求助20
18秒前
pphome发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
孟龙威发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
Prescott's Microbiology: 2026 Release ISE 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Environmental Leverage in Times of Climate Crisis: Product Standards, Carbon Border Measures and Preferential Trade Agreements 1000
Interactions of Vowel Quality and Prosody in East Slavic 1000
Erwählung und Berufung bei Paulus: Bedeutung, Entwicklung und Funktion einer Vorstellung in ihrem frühjüdischen und griechisch-römischen Kontext 850
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7191898
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8828564
关于积分的说明 18639442
捐赠科研通 6826859
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3175528
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2327206
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2149931