医学
随机对照试验
物理疗法
冲程(发动机)
健康
人口
随机化
初级保健
风险因素
干预(咨询)
临床试验
意向治疗分析
弗雷明翰风险评分
子群分析
最小临床重要差异
心理干预
内科学
中风恢复
儿科
样本量测定
平均差
协方差分析
体质指数
作者
Seana Gall,Valery L. Feigin,Kate Chappell,Amanda Gay Thrift,Timothy John Kleinig,Dominique Ann-Michele Cadilhac,Derrick Bennett,Mark Raymond Nelson,Tara L. Purvis,Shabnam Jalili‐Moghaddam,Gemma Kitsos,Rita Krishnamurthi
出处
期刊:Stroke
[Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
日期:2026-06-01
卷期号:57 (8): 2254-2264
标识
DOI:10.1161/strokeaha.125.054001
摘要
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the efficacy of the Stroke Riskometer mobile phone application to change the Life’s Simple 7 risk factor score in a primary prevention population at 6 months postrandomization. METHODS: This phase III, prospective, outcome assessor–blinded, 2-arm randomized controlled trial in Australia and New Zealand recruited participants from August 2021 to January 2024. Inclusion criteria: age ≥35 and ≤75 years; ≥2 risk factors; smartphone ownership; and no cardiovascular disease history. The intervention group was given access to the application; the usual care group received one email with generic risk factor information. The primary outcome was the mean between-group difference in Life’s Simple 7 (score 0 [poor] to 14 [ideal], comprising blood pressure, cholesterol, glucose, body mass index, smoking, and physical activity and diet) from baseline to 6 months postrandomization. Secondary outcomes were between-group changes in individual Life’s Simple 7 items. Analyses were performed using intention-to-treat principles with ANCOVA and linear mixed models to examine differences between groups, with prespecified per-protocol and subgroup analyses. RESULTS: We randomized 862 participants (mean±SD age, 58±11 years; 63% women; 74% White). At 6 months postrandomization in intention-to-treat analyses, the mean difference between usual care (n=433) and intervention (n=429) groups in the change in Life’s Simple 7 score from baseline was 0.03 ([95% CI, −0.19 to 0.25]; P =0.788). Per-protocol analyses (n=320 usual care; n=276 intervention) were similar (mean difference in change, 0.20 [95% CI, −0.04 to 0.43]; P =0.106). Compared with usual care in intention-to-treat analyses, the intervention group had a nonsignificant increase in metabolic equivalent of task (metabolic equivalent of task) minutes per week of physical activity (313.42 [95% CI, −2.80 to 629.65]; P =0.052), with no differences in other Life’s Simple 7 items. CONCLUSIONS: Among a general population aged 35 years to 75 years with ≥2 stroke risk factors, there was no evidence that having access to the application changed overall Life’s Simple 7 scores at 6-month follow-up. Participants in the intervention group did have a nonsignificant increase in physical activity, compared with the usual care group, after 6 months, but not in other individual risk factors. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/ ; Unique identifier: ACTRN12621000211864.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI