Long-term mortality and quality of life in sepsis: A systematic review*

医学 期限(时间) 重症监护医学 败血症 内科学 量子力学 物理
作者
Bradford D. Winters,Michael Eberlein,Janice M. Leung,Dale M. Needham,Peter J. Pronovost,Jonathan Sevransky
出处
期刊:Critical Care Medicine [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:38 (5): 1276-1283 被引量:584
标识
DOI:10.1097/ccm.0b013e3181d8cc1d
摘要

Long-term outcomes from sepsis are poorly understood, and sepsis in patients may have different long-term effects on mortality and quality of life. Long-term outcome studies of other critical illnesses such as acute lung injury have demonstrated incremental health effects that persist after hospital discharge. Whether patients with sepsis have similar long-term mortality and quality-of-life effects is unclear.We performed a systematic review of studies reporting long-term mortality and quality-of-life data (>3 months) in patients with sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock using defined search criteria.Systematic review of the literature.None.Patients with sepsis showed ongoing mortality up to 2 yrs and beyond after the standard 28-day inhospital mortality end point. Patients with sepsis also had decrements in quality-of-life measures after hospital discharge. Results were consistent across varying severity of illness and different patient populations in different countries, including large and small studies. In addition, these results were consistent within observational and randomized, controlled trials. Study quality was limited by inadequate control groups and poor adjustment for confounding variables.Patients with sepsis have ongoing mortality beyond short-term end points, and survivors consistently demonstrate impaired quality of life. The use of 28-day mortality as an end point for clinical studies may lead to inaccurate inferences. Both observational and interventional future studies should include longer-term end points to better-understand the natural history of sepsis and the effect of interventions on patient morbidities.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
开放凝珍完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
水牛完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
John发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
1秒前
吃菜菜发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
wlin发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
务实幻露发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
ECHO发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
Vanilla应助Lavandula采纳,获得20
3秒前
ardejiang完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
zjuzj发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
小马甲应助biopig采纳,获得10
4秒前
蒸蒸完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
陈林发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
隐形曼青应助黑球采纳,获得10
4秒前
苦杏仁完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
miaozhu发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
呵呵呵呵发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
Ava应助熊熊之火采纳,获得100
5秒前
6秒前
热心海云完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
傅宛白发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
了晨发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
科研通AI6应助水菜泽子采纳,获得10
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
浮游应助何敏采纳,获得10
8秒前
9秒前
苏东方发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
wanci应助淡定的安梦采纳,获得30
10秒前
LLL发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
Hao发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
搜集达人应助ardejiang采纳,获得10
10秒前
高分求助中
Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science Third edition 2025 12000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Social Work Ethics Casebook: Cases and Commentary (revised 2nd ed.). Frederic G. Reamer 800
Beyond the sentence : discourse and sentential form / edited by Jessica R. Wirth 600
Holistic Discourse Analysis 600
Vertébrés continentaux du Crétacé supérieur de Provence (Sud-Est de la France) 600
Reliability Monitoring Program 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5340428
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4476928
关于积分的说明 13933312
捐赠科研通 4372740
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2402526
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1395409
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1367489