Variation in red cell transfusion decisions in the intensive care unit – a nationwide survey in the Netherlands

Background and Objectives Most guidelines recommend a restrictive transfusion trigger of 7 g/dl. It is unclear whether this resulted in more uniform transfusion practices. The primary objective was to uncover the extent of variation in transfusion decisions within four scenarios of critically ill patients among critical care physicians in the Netherlands. Materials and methods An online survey comprising four different hypothetical clinical scenarios was sent to all members of the Dutch Society of Intensive Care. The scenarios represented patients with acute myocardial infarction (Hb 8·5 g/ dl ), abdominal sepsis (Hb 7·1 g/ dl ), traumatic brain injury ( TBI ) (Hb 7·9 g/ dl ) and post‐surgical complications (Hb 7·3 g/ dl ). The questions explored the decision whether or not to transfuse and a ranking of clinical characteristics playing the most important role in the transfusion decision. Results A total of 224 members (22%) participated in the study of whom 188 (84%) completed all questions. The percentages of respondents that decided to transfuse ranged from 25·9% in the scenario with TBI to 81·6% in the scenario with post‐surgical complications. Most controversy was seen in the scenario with sepsis for which 43·2% decided to transfuse, whereas 56·8% decided not to. Haemoglobin level, diagnosis and haemodynamics were most important for the transfusion decision in all scenarios. Conclusions Physicians decided differently on red‐blood‐cell transfusion given the clinical scenarios and weighed clinical characteristics differently in their transfusion decisions. These findings suggest there still is substantial variation in critical care transfusion practice.