A Scoping Review of Registered Clinical Studies on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Concussion (2000 to 2019)

Abstract BACKGROUND While many patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) or concussion recover completely, prolonged postconcussion symptoms remain a challenge for patients and an opportunity for clinical research. This has led to numerous research initiatives over the last 2 decades. OBJECTIVE To review the characteristics of clinical studies on management of mTBI/concussion; and to examine their definitions of mTBI/concussion. METHODS This scoping review included all clinical studies on diagnosis and management of patients with mTBI/concussion registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov from 2000 to June/2019. The terms “mild TBI/concussion” were used for the primary search. Definitions of mTBI/concussion were obtained from the protocols. When a definition was missing in the website, the study's investigators were contacted for clarification. RESULTS There were 225 interventional and 95 observational studies. Most of the studies are focused on treatment (54.7%) or diagnosis (37.5%), while 3.4% examined preventive measures, 2.8% evaluated prognostic instruments, and 1.6% developed registries. Most of the studies in this American database were single-center initiatives led by American and Canadian institutions. The definitions of mTBI/concussion differed widely among 109 studies. CONCLUSION The results of this review suggest that most of the clinical studies are focused on diagnosis and non-pharmacological therapies for patients with mTBI/concussion. The large number of differing definitions of mTBI/concussion among the studies creates significant limitations when comparing studies. The requirements for registering research protocols on mTBI/concussion should include the necessity to state the definition being used. There is a need for consensus on a uniform definition of concussion.