自反性
定性研究
主观性
背景(考古学)
过程(计算)
认识论
集合(抽象数据类型)
人际交往
社会学
工程伦理学
心理学
计算机科学
社会心理学
社会科学
哲学
工程类
古生物学
操作系统
生物
程序设计语言
作者
Francisco Manuel Olmos‐Vega,Renée E. Stalmeijer,Lara Varpio,Renate Kahlke
出处
期刊:Medical Teacher
[Taylor & Francis]
日期:2022-04-07
卷期号:45 (3): 241-251
被引量:492
标识
DOI:10.1080/0142159x.2022.2057287
摘要
Qualitative research relies on nuanced judgements that require researcher reflexivity, yet reflexivity is often addressed superficially or overlooked completely during the research process. In this AMEE Guide, we define reflexivity as a set of continuous, collaborative, and multifaceted practices through which researchers self-consciously critique, appraise, and evaluate how their subjectivity and context influence the research processes. We frame reflexivity as a way to embrace and value researchers’ subjectivity. We also describe the purposes that reflexivity can have depending on different paradigmatic choices. We then address how researchers can account for the significance of the intertwined personal, interpersonal, methodological, and contextual factors that bring research into being and offer specific strategies for communicating reflexivity in research dissemination. With the growth of qualitative research in health professions education, it is essential that qualitative researchers carefully consider their paradigmatic stance and use reflexive practices to align their decisions at all stages of their research. We hope this Guide will illuminate such a path, demonstrating how reflexivity can be used to develop and communicate rigorous qualitative research.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI