Women in Medicine: Evidence That More Evidence Is Insufficient in Effecting Improvements

多样性(政治) 医疗保健 医学教育 面子(社会学概念) 社会文化进化 梅德林 循证医学 心理学 医学 公共关系 政治学 社会学 社会科学 法学
作者
Janet Bickel
出处
期刊:Academic Medicine [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:92 (3): 274-274 被引量:7
标识
DOI:10.1097/acm.0000000000001549
摘要

To the Editor: Academic Medicine’s special collection on women in medicine in the August 2016 issue fleshes out a body of evidence that was already standing tall in 2002 when the Association of American Medical Colleges’ (AAMC’s) Increasing Women’s Leadership Project Implementation Committee published its report.1 Apparently, the changes indicated years ago to support continuing progress still lack “legs.” As Helitzer et al2 conclude, “The academic structure and culture … have proven exceptionally resistant to change with its deeply entrenched faculty values system and ingrained sociocultural norms that impede organizational innovations and leadership diversity.” Also of interest, this team of investigators generated a “systems of career influence” model highlighting the interplay between individual choices and organizational practices3 that is also relevant to men’s development—as I find true of all the best work that is published under the heading “women in medicine.” As Sklar4 notes in his helpful prefatory editorial, “a 24-hour child care center in the hospital … [is] a patient safety issue … it is an issue for everyone.” Yet little progress in this direction has been occurring. Since we now have evidence that more evidence is insufficient in effecting such improvements, let’s do more with the good examples we have—for instance, the women in medicine and health science program initiatives that have achieved impressive results at the University of California, Davis School of Medicine.5 Also, many men are attending to the extra challenges women face and more effectively mentoring them to develop their careers,6 and many department heads are working individually to foster work–life integration and the development of all their faculty. Might women be supporting these quiet champions to influence those with the power and resources to build child care centers and hold department heads accountable for improving faculty diversity and mentoring? And since these are “our” issues rather than “women’s issues,” might AAMC’s councils work together to foster such overdue “innovations”? Janet Bickel, MALeadership and career development coach, Falls Church, Virginia; [email protected]

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
天天快乐应助李明采纳,获得10
1秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
科研通AI6.1应助严昌采纳,获得10
4秒前
Hou完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
Joey完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
8秒前
8秒前
8秒前
3089ggf完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
ywhys完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
葡萄柚子应助Spongeeeee采纳,获得20
12秒前
lemishui完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
14秒前
15秒前
阿南发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
15秒前
滴迪氐媂完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
李明发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
16秒前
烟花应助花889采纳,获得10
16秒前
16秒前
咸地瓜完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
Twilight发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
18秒前
信远征发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
花誉来完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
20秒前
深情安青应助大胆的曼岚采纳,获得30
20秒前
laifeihong发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
22秒前
23秒前
24秒前
24秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science Reference Third edition 6000
Encyclopedia of Forensic and Legal Medicine Third Edition 5000
Introduction to strong mixing conditions volume 1-3 5000
Aerospace Engineering Education During the First Century of Flight 3000
Agyptische Geschichte der 21.30. Dynastie 3000
Les Mantodea de guyane 2000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5786198
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5692433
关于积分的说明 15469181
捐赠科研通 4915143
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2645551
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1593292
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1547635