Interpreting the ‘selection effect’ of biodiversity on ecosystem function

Abstract Experimental ecosystems often function differently than expected under the null hypothesis that intra‐ and interspecific interactions are identical. Recent theory attributes this to the ‘selection effect’ (dominance by species with particular traits), and the ‘complementarity effect’ (niche differentiation and/or facilitative interactions). Using the Price Equation, I show that the ‘selection effect’ only partially reflects dominance by species with particular traits at the expense of other species, and therefore is only partially analogous to natural selection. I then derive a new, tripartite partition of the difference between observed and expected ecosystem function. The ‘dominance effect’ is analogous to natural selection. ‘Trait‐independent complementarity’ occurs when species function better than expected, independent of their traits and not at the expense of other species. ‘Trait‐dependent complementarity’ occurs when species with particular traits function better than expected, but not at the expense of other species. I illustrate the application of this new partition using experimental data.