多西紫杉醇
医学
紫杉醇
转移性乳腺癌
内科学
养生
化疗
肿瘤科
紫杉烷
危险系数
乳腺癌
人口
癌症
置信区间
环境卫生
作者
Stephen E. Jones,John K. Erban,Beth Overmoyer,G. T. Budd,Laura F. Hutchins,EE Lower,Leslie Rodgers Laufman,Srinand Sundaram,W J Urba,Kathleen I. Pritchard,Robert Mennel,Donald Richards,Steven R. Olsen,Marlene Meyers,Peter M. Ravdin
标识
DOI:10.1200/jco.2005.02.027
摘要
This randomized, controlled, multicenter, open-label, phase III study compared docetaxel versus paclitaxel in patients with advanced breast cancer that had progressed after an anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimen.Patients (n = 449) were randomly assigned to receive either docetaxel 100 mg/m2 (n = 225) or paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (n = 224) on day 1, every 21 days until tumor progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent.In the intent-to-treat population, both the median overall survival (OS, 15.4 v 12.7 months; hazard ratio [HR], 1.41; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.73; P = .03) and the median time to progression (TTP, 5.7 months v 3.6 months; HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.33 to 2.02; P < .0001) for docetaxel were significantly longer than for paclitaxel, and the overall response rate (ORR, 32% v 25%; P = .10) was higher for docetaxel. These results were confirmed by multivariate analyses. The incidence of treatment-related hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities was greater for docetaxel than for paclitaxel; however, quality-of-life scores were not statistically different between treatment groups over time.Docetaxel was superior to paclitaxel in terms of OS and TTP. ORR was higher for docetaxel. Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities occurred more frequently in the docetaxel group. The global quality-of-life scores were similar for both agents over time.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI