A Comparison of Ultrasound‐guided Three‐in‐one Femoral Nerve Block Versus Parenteral Opioids Alone for Analgesia in Emergency Department Patients With Hip Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial

医学 急诊科 随机对照试验 简短疼痛清单 麻醉 恶心 安慰剂 呕吐 髋部骨折 类阿片 物理疗法 外科 慢性疼痛 内科学 骨质疏松症 替代医学 受体 病理 精神科
作者
Francesca L. Beaudoin,John P. Haran,Otto Liebmann
出处
期刊:Academic Emergency Medicine [Wiley]
卷期号:20 (6): 584-591 被引量:166
标识
DOI:10.1111/acem.12154
摘要

Abstract Objectives The primary objective was to compare the efficacy of ultrasound ( US )‐guided three‐in‐one femoral nerve blocks to standard treatment with parenteral opioids for pain control in elderly patients with hip fractures in the emergency department ( ED ). Methods A randomized controlled trial was conducted at a large urban academic ED over an 18‐month period. A convenience sample of older adults (age ≥ 55 years) with confirmed hip fractures and moderate to severe pain (numeric rating score ≥ 5) were randomized to one of two treatment arms: US ‐guided three‐in‐one femoral nerve block plus morphine ( FNB group) or standard care, consisting of placebo (sham injection) plus morphine ( SC group). Intravenous ( IV ) morphine was prescribed and dosed at the discretion of the treating physician; physicians were advised to target a 50% reduction in pain or per‐patient request. The primary outcome measure of pain relief, or pain intensity reduction, was derived using the 11‐point numerical rating scale ( NRS ) and calculated as the summed pain‐intensity difference ( SPID ) over 4 hours. Secondary outcome measures included the amount of rescue analgesia and occurrence of adverse events (respiratory depression, hypotension, nausea, or vomiting). Outcome measures were compared between groups using analysis of variance for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical data. Results Thirty‐six patients (18 in each arm) completed the study. There was no difference between treatment groups with respect to age, sex, fracture type, vital signs (baseline and at 4 hours), ED length of stay ( LOS ), pre‐enrollment analgesia, or baseline pain intensity. In comparing pain intensity at the end of the study period, NRS scores at 4 hours were significantly lower in the FNB group (p < 0.001). Over the 4‐hour study period, patients in the FNB group experienced significantly greater overall pain relief than those in the SC group, with a median SPID of 11.0 (interquartile range [ IQR ] = 4.0 to 21.8) in the FNB group versus 4.0 ( IQR = −2.0 to 5.8) in the SC group (p = 0.001). No patient in the SC group achieved a clinically significant reduction in pain. Moreover, patients in the SC group received significantly more IV morphine than those in the FNB group (5.0 mg, IQR = 2.0 to 8.4 mg vs. 0.0 mg, IQR = 0.0 to 1.5 mg; p = 0.028). There was no difference in adverse events between groups. Conclusions Ultrasound‐guided femoral nerve block as an adjunct to SC resulted in 1) significantly reduced pain intensity over 4 hours, 2) decreased amount of rescue analgesia, and 3) no appreciable difference in adverse events when compared with SC alone. Furthermore, standard pain management with parenteral opioids alone provided ineffective pain control in our study cohort of patients with severe pain from their hip fractures. Regional anesthesia has a role in the ED , and US ‐guided femoral nerve blocks for pain management in older adults with hip fractures should routinely be considered, particularly in cases of refractory or severe pain.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Nole的应助被薛定谔的猫采纳,获得10
刚刚
丘比特的应助被踏实的哑铃采纳,获得10
1秒前
天天快乐的应助被木启采纳,获得30
2秒前
4秒前
范小羽发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
可爱的函函的应助被yyyyy采纳,获得10
5秒前
Ducktorlee完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
6秒前
lililix完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
科研通AI6.2的应助被正直向卉采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
8秒前
9秒前
10秒前
CipherSage的应助被沉静的砖头采纳,获得10
10秒前
poiuy发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
JamesPei的应助被彪壮的凌文采纳,获得10
12秒前
孙光远完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
受伤白安发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
科研通AI6.4的应助被YY采纳,获得10
13秒前
蔡七月发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
MHY完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
大模型的应助被Constantine采纳,获得10
15秒前
美好曼寒发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
18秒前
19秒前
20秒前
22秒前
22秒前
24秒前
奇逆的应助被kuzzi采纳,获得10
25秒前
26秒前
jojo发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
郑琦敏钰完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
天真雨梅发布了新的文献求助10
27秒前
28秒前
28秒前
正直向卉发布了新的文献求助10
29秒前
Jasper的应助被孙光远采纳,获得10
29秒前
沃德天发布了新的文献求助10
30秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)通过应助OA文献获取积分 10000
Rosenblum, Global Change Biology 800
Computational Chemical Reaction Engineering: Modeling, Simulation, and Design with MATLAB 600
Organizational Behavior 510
Management and the Arts 510
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 400
CLSI C56QG Examples of Hemolyzed, Icteric, and Lipemic/Turbid Samples Quick Guide 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 计算机科学 工程类 纳米技术 内科学 物理 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 复合材料 光电子学 细胞生物学 心理学 量子力学 催化作用 物理化学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7815391
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9344984
关于积分的说明 20526935
捐赠科研通 7408181
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3330903
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2477412
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2350607