Placental, maternal, fetal, and technical origins of false-positive cell-free DNA screening results

胎儿游离DNA 医学 非整倍体 产前诊断 怀孕 基因检测 胎儿 产科 胎盘功能不全 胎盘 染色体 遗传学 生物 内科学 基因
作者
Yvette C. Raymond,Shavi Fernando,Melody Menezes,Ben W. Mol,Andrew McLennan,Fabrício da Silva Costa,Tristan Hardy,Daniel L. Rolnik
出处
期刊:American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:230 (4): 381-389 被引量:8
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2023.11.1240
摘要

The introduction of noninvasive prenatal testing has resulted in substantial reductions to previously accepted false-positive rates of prenatal screening. Despite this, the possibility of false-positive results remains a challenging consideration in clinical practice, particularly considering the increasing uptake of genome-wide noninvasive prenatal testing, and the subsequent increased proportion of high-risk results attributable to various biological events besides fetal aneuploidy. Confined placental mosaicism, whereby chromosome anomalies exclusively affect the placenta, is perhaps the most widely accepted cause of false-positive noninvasive prenatal testing. There remains, however, a substantial degree of ambiguity in the literature pertaining to the clinical ramifications of confined placental mosaicism and its potential association with placental insufficiency, and consequentially adverse pregnancy outcomes including fetal growth restriction. Other causes of false-positive noninvasive prenatal testing include vanishing twin syndrome, in which the cell-free DNA from a demised aneuploidy-affected twin triggers a high-risk result, technical failures, and maternal origins of abnormal cell-free DNA such as uterine fibroids or unrecognized mosaicisms. Most concerningly, maternal malignancies are also a documented cause of false-positive screening results. In this review, we compile what is currently known about the various causes of false-positive noninvasive prenatal testing. The introduction of noninvasive prenatal testing has resulted in substantial reductions to previously accepted false-positive rates of prenatal screening. Despite this, the possibility of false-positive results remains a challenging consideration in clinical practice, particularly considering the increasing uptake of genome-wide noninvasive prenatal testing, and the subsequent increased proportion of high-risk results attributable to various biological events besides fetal aneuploidy. Confined placental mosaicism, whereby chromosome anomalies exclusively affect the placenta, is perhaps the most widely accepted cause of false-positive noninvasive prenatal testing. There remains, however, a substantial degree of ambiguity in the literature pertaining to the clinical ramifications of confined placental mosaicism and its potential association with placental insufficiency, and consequentially adverse pregnancy outcomes including fetal growth restriction. Other causes of false-positive noninvasive prenatal testing include vanishing twin syndrome, in which the cell-free DNA from a demised aneuploidy-affected twin triggers a high-risk result, technical failures, and maternal origins of abnormal cell-free DNA such as uterine fibroids or unrecognized mosaicisms. Most concerningly, maternal malignancies are also a documented cause of false-positive screening results. In this review, we compile what is currently known about the various causes of false-positive noninvasive prenatal testing. eyJraWQiOiI4ZjUxYWNhY2IzYjhiNjNlNzFlYmIzYWFmYTU5NmZmYyIsImFsZyI6IlJTMjU2In0.eyJzdWIiOiIyYTdiZjE1ODZjY2JiOGI1OTc2NDU2ZjJhMmRjZGViYiIsImtpZCI6IjhmNTFhY2FjYjNiOGI2M2U3MWViYjNhYWZhNTk2ZmZjIiwiZXhwIjoxNzA0NDQzMDY0fQ.rJRcxr8qEPm_OkeG176br8ceOv0baXEopjjTzpUMMCMHwzYeS2cXX-hSHHetmdGqcKvFwAkDmhPCIeRXoxzvBewIP-6dyyM7bibnZvD-RFL-gfNztMlusp7rQFAhCAfNz4sO8Gin30roRSRFer-pSG6BoH71O4bQAv6J793V0QIyqXSLoyRzlj4cqMEdR9JigOeqPxeOLfiCpUvD-GKVFqS0qgCLlQpq-LZYYy9Zu_gFSXfqxsnPNHduyEBbL-BR4G3U3OhjR57-lGK_G1d-dhZ3O7uKI8Ocvo6irBcD8unsJovLdmwlkLzWDdrTRVA5N55oqIYdi1vFww4-gy52mA(mp4, (21.33 MB) Download video
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
xxw发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
大白完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
科目三应助坏坏的快乐采纳,获得30
3秒前
joey106完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
Serena完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
zhc发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
13秒前
14秒前
14秒前
时尚的梦曼完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
xxw完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
袋鼠发布了新的文献求助20
17秒前
miaomiao发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
FashionBoy应助要减肥的访旋采纳,获得10
19秒前
20秒前
20秒前
22秒前
22秒前
陈熹发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
finn发布了新的文献求助10
24秒前
Gypsy完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
净净子发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
Luffa完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
白开水完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
田様应助bommi采纳,获得10
26秒前
沐沐完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
852应助热情的水杯采纳,获得10
27秒前
28秒前
汉堡包应助yuaaaann采纳,获得10
28秒前
科研通AI2S应助wenfeisun采纳,获得10
30秒前
31秒前
领导范儿应助陈熹采纳,获得10
31秒前
华仔应助小兔子采纳,获得10
32秒前
didi完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
33秒前
huhaha完成签到,获得积分20
33秒前
34秒前
dreamode完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
35秒前
不安服饰发布了新的文献求助10
36秒前
高分求助中
【此为提示信息,请勿应助】请按要求发布求助,避免被关 20000
Encyclopedia of Geology (2nd Edition) 2000
Maneuvering of a Damaged Navy Combatant 650
Периодизация спортивной тренировки. Общая теория и её практическое применение 310
Mixing the elements of mass customisation 300
the MD Anderson Surgical Oncology Manual, Seventh Edition 300
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 300
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3780310
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3325580
关于积分的说明 10223667
捐赠科研通 3040766
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1668988
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 798962
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 758648