Visceral and subcutaneous adiposity and cardiovascular disease: Unravelling associations and prognostic value

AIM: The distribution pattern of abdominal adiposity may help determine cardiovascular disease (CVD). Waist circumference (WC) is the most common but imprecise method for measuring abdominal adiposity, as it fails to differentiate between visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (ASAT). This study aimed to determine whether elevated VAT or ASAT provides greater prognostic value for CVD events compared to elevated WC in the general population using data from the UK Biobank. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this secondary analysis of UK Biobank study, 24 265 participants with available abdominal magnetic resonance imaging data were included. The primary outcome of the study was coronary heart disease (CHD), and secondary outcomes included stroke, heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF). Cox regressions for VAT, ASAT and WC were examined in relation to the predefined outcomes on continuous scales using standard deviation (SD) changes and by categories of concordant and discordant values defined by medians. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up period of 12.9 ± 1.8 years, 2641 participants developed CVD events (1296 CHD, 165 stroke, 286 HF and 894 AF) Each 1 SD increase in VAT yielded a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.15 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09-1.22) for CHD risk, whereas ASAT had a HR of 1.10 (95% CI: 1.04-1.18). Further adjustment for WC eliminated the association between ASAT and CHD risk, in contrast to the association between VAT and CHD risk, which remained almost unaffected. Discordant VAT above the median with WC below presented a HR of 1.43 (95% CI: 1.15-1.78) for CHD, compared with concordant VAT and WC below the median. Similar results were found for discordant WC above the median with VAT below, with a HR of 1.46 (95% CI: 1.18-1.81). In contrast, discordant ASAT above the median with WC below was not associated with an increased risk of CHD. Similarly, discordant ASAT above the median with VAT below was not associated with an increased risk of CHD. Additionally, there was no observed association between VAT or ASAT and the risks of stroke, HF or AF after further adjustment for WC. Additionally, there was no observed association between VAT or ASAT and the risks of stroke, HF or AF after further adjustment for WC. CONCLUSION: Incorporating VAT measurements alongside WC data improved the ability to identify individuals at high risk for CHD compared to using WC alone. Both VAT and WC proved to be more accurate indicators of CHD risk than ASAT. However, VAT alone did not fully account for the CHD risk associated with elevated WC levels. Neither VAT nor ASAT showed an association with the risk of stroke, HF and AF.