Early Experience With Pediatric Single-port Robotic Pyeloplasty Compared to Multiport Robotic Cohorts

No AccessJournal of UrologyJU Forum1 Aug 2023Early Experience With Pediatric Single-port Robotic Pyeloplasty Compared to Multiport Robotic Cohortsis corrected byEarly Experience With Pediatric Single-port Robotic Pyeloplasty Compared to Multiport Robotic Cohorts Jordan M. Smith, Alexandra D. Hernandez, Romano T. DeMarco, and Christopher E. Bayne Jordan M. SmithJordan M. Smith Department of Urology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida More articles by this author , Alexandra D. HernandezAlexandra D. Hernandez Department of Urology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida More articles by this author , Romano T. DeMarcoRomano T. DeMarco Department of Urology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida More articles by this author , and Christopher E. BayneChristopher E. Bayne *Correspondence: Department of Urology, University of Florida College of Medicine, PO Box 100247, Gainesville, FL 32610 telephone: 352-273-6815; E-mail Address: [email protected] Department of Urology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003551AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail REFERENCES 1. . Single port robotic surgery in urology. Curr Urol Rep. 2021; 22(4):22. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 2. . Single-port robotic pyeloplasty in a pediatric patient. Videourology. 2021; 10.1089/vid.2020.0112. Crossref, Google Scholar 3. . Single-port robotic Mitrofanoff in a pediatric patient. J Pediatr Urol. 2021; 17(3):424-425. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 4. . Comparison of intraoperative and short-term postoperative outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic multi-port pyeloplasty using the da Vinci Si system and single-port pyeloplasty using the da Vinci SP system in children. Investig Clin Urol. 2021; 62(5):592-599. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 5. . Hidden incision endoscopic surgery: description of technique, parental satisfaction and applications. J Urol. 2011; 185(4):1425-1431. Link, Google Scholar 6. . Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004; 240(2):205-213. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 7. . Early diuresis renogram findings predict success following pyeloplasty. J Urol. 2001; 165(6 Pt 2):2311-2315. Link, Google Scholar 8. Single-port versus multi-port robotic-assisted procedures from the patient's perspective: a retrospective cohort study. Urol Pract. 2022; 9(6):574-579. Google Scholar 9. . Single-port robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in a pediatric cohort using a mini-Pfannenstiel incision. Abstract presented at The Societies for Pediatric Urology Fall Congress; October 20-23, 2022; Las Vegas, Nevada. Google Scholar 10. . Single-port (SP) robotic nephroureterectomy in a pediatric patient. JU Open Plus. 2023; 1(1):e00005. Crossref, Google Scholar Support: None. Conflict of Interest: The Authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Ethics Statement: This study received Institutional Review Board approval (IRB No. IRB202201351). Author Contributions: Conceptualization: JMS, RTD, CEB; Data curation: JMS, ADH, CEB; Analysis: JMS, CEB; Writing—original draft: JMS, CEB; Writing—review and editing: all authors © 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byBayne C and Smith J (2023) Early Experience With Pediatric Single-port Robotic Pyeloplasty Compared to Multiport Robotic Cohorts. Reply.Journal of Urology, VOL. 210, NO. 5, (733-733), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2023.Nikolinakos P, Sapountzis D, Donkov I, Bishara S, Charitopoulos K, Ellis D, Ali M, Velaoras K, Alexandrou I, Zavras N and Norris J (2023) Early Experience With Pediatric Single-port Robotic Pyeloplasty Compared to Multiport Robotic Cohorts. Letter.Journal of Urology, VOL. 210, NO. 5, (732-733), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2023.Related articlesJournal of Urology9 Aug 2023Early Experience With Pediatric Single-port Robotic Pyeloplasty Compared to Multiport Robotic Cohorts Volume 210Issue 2August 2023Page: 236-238 Peer Review Reports Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2023 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Keywordschildadolescentkidney pelvisureteral obstructionrobotic surgical proceduresMetrics Author Information Jordan M. Smith Department of Urology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida More articles by this author Alexandra D. Hernandez Department of Urology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida More articles by this author Romano T. DeMarco Department of Urology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida More articles by this author Christopher E. Bayne Department of Urology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida *Correspondence: Department of Urology, University of Florida College of Medicine, PO Box 100247, Gainesville, FL 32610 telephone: 352-273-6815; E-mail Address: [email protected] More articles by this author Expand All Support: None. Conflict of Interest: The Authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Ethics Statement: This study received Institutional Review Board approval (IRB No. IRB202201351). Author Contributions: Conceptualization: JMS, RTD, CEB; Data curation: JMS, ADH, CEB; Analysis: JMS, CEB; Writing—original draft: JMS, CEB; Writing—review and editing: all authors Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...