Results of Two Studies of Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Bioequivalence of Russian Generic Valsartan / Sacubitril Compared to the Original Valsartan / Sacubitril in Healthy Volunteers

生物等效性 医学 缬沙坦 药代动力学 沙库比林、缬沙坦 沙库比林 置信区间 药理学 不利影响 药品 分析物 交叉研究 食品药品监督管理局 摄入 口服 内科学
作者
В. Н. Ларина,Irina S. Rodyukova,S.M. Kryzhanovskiy,K.S. Manko,E. V. Timoshina
出处
期刊:Kardiologiya [APO Society of Specialists in Heart Failure]
卷期号:65 (10): 71-76 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.18087/cardio.2025.10.n3032
摘要

Aim To study the pharmacokinetics and safety and to prove the bioequivalence of Akrivario* (valsartan + sacubitril) film-coated tablets, at two dosages, 200 mg and 100 mg, compared to Uperio** (valsartan + sacubitril) film-coated tablets, at similar dosages, 200 mg and 100 mg (Studies 1 and 2, respectively), after oral administration to fasted healthy volunteers.Material and methods Two four-period, crossover-design bioequivalence studies were conducted. In each study, fasted healthy volunteers (Study 1: n=60; Study 2: n=59) received a single dose of the drugs. The interval between drug administrations was 7 days. Analyte concentrations in blood samples were measured by validated high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for both valsartan and sacubitril in both studies.Results The 90% confidence intervals for the Ln-transformed ratios of all assessed pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax and AUC0-t for valsartan and sacubitril) were in the range of 80-125%. Both study drugs were well tolerated; all adverse events (AEs) were mild and did not require additional therapy. No clinically significant AEs were observed during the study.Conclusion: The study demonstrated bioequivalence of Akrivario (valsartan + sacubitril) to the reference drug Uperio (valsartan + sacubitril).
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
whiteside完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
hhhhh完成签到 ,获得积分20
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
HW完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
露露子完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
小白一号完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
乾三发布了新的文献求助30
4秒前
背光完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
ansteel应助小李老博采纳,获得10
5秒前
怪默完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
柑橘乌云完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
aki完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
细腻的向薇完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
valiente完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
蝃蝀完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
英姑应助开朗姝采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
两只晕虾完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
谦让的溪流完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
子车雁开完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
无韶的月亮树完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
东方半仙完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
大个应助蝃蝀采纳,获得10
12秒前
filter完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
王小冉发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
shining完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
feier完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
笑点低惜梦完成签到,获得积分20
15秒前
16秒前
16秒前
黄金城发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
songfeifeng发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
yxh020807完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
儿学化学打断腿完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
jueshan发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
沐雨完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Römisch-Germanische Forschungen 1000
APA handbook of comparative psychology: Basic concepts, methods, neural substrate, and behavior 1000
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
An introduction of AMSTAR-2: a quality assessment instrument of systematic reviews including randomized or non-randomized controlled trials or both 500
An introduction to a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews/meta-analysis: AMSTAR 500
The formulation methods and steps of umbrella review 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7605846
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9181665
关于积分的说明 19663197
捐赠科研通 7180232
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3269523
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2433442
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2263701