心理学
斯科普斯
情商
干预(咨询)
学业成绩
考试(生物学)
结果(博弈论)
实证研究
高等教育
应用心理学
生成语法
教育技术
样品(材料)
体验式学习
教学设计
数学教育
教学方法
学习风格
经验证据
学习技巧
医学教育
计算机辅助教学
混合学习
研究设计
认知
主动学习(机器学习)
专业发展
元认知
社会心理学
发展心理学
持续时间(音乐)
作者
Yuhui Jing,JunYi Wang,PeiJun Wang,Jun Hao Xu
摘要
ABSTRACT Background In recent years, Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has been increasingly adopted in higher education to support undergraduate learning. Despite its rapid integration into educational settings, the effects of GenAI on learning outcomes remain inconclusive owing to varying study designs and outcome measures. Objectives This study aims to synthesise empirical evidence on the effectiveness of GenAI in improving undergraduate students' learning outcomes across three dimensions: academic performance, professional skills and emotional attitude. Methods A meta‐analysis was conducted on 35 experimental and quasi‐experimental studies published between 2022 and 2024, retrieved from Web of Science (SCI‐Expanded and SSCI), EBSCO (ERIC) and Scopus databases. The analysis examined the overall effects of GenAI and explored the moderating variables, including discipline type, teaching model, intervention duration, learning method and GenAI interaction method. Results and Conclusions We test the impact of GenAI on undergraduate learning outcomes across three dimensions: academic performance, professional skills and emotional attitude. The findings reveal that: (1) GenAI significantly improves students' learning outcomes, with a particularly prominent positive effect on professional skills ( g = 0.72) and moderate positive effects on academic performance ( g = 0.46) and emotional attitude ( g = 0.44). (2) The effects of GenAI are not universal, but are significantly moderated by key factors, including intervention duration, teaching model and GenAI interaction method. (3) The findings identify potentially favourable instructional combinations for different learning objectives, such as enhancing academic or skill‐based outcomes. However, these subgroup results should be interpreted cautiously in relation to sample size, intervention duration and outcome measurement. These findings provide methodological guidance for university faculty to effectively integrate GenAI into classroom teaching and offer evidentiary support for policies aimed at enhancing teachers' AI instructional competency.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI