医学
禁忌症
生活质量(医疗保健)
负压伤口治疗
外科
随机对照试验
伤口护理
人口
糖尿病足溃疡
临床试验
糖尿病足
不利影响
临床终点
糖尿病
物理疗法
内科学
替代医学
护理部
环境卫生
病理
内分泌学
作者
Hyun-Jung Lee,BK Kim,Hi‐Joon Park,J-W Koo,Jin‐Soo Kim
标识
DOI:10.1136/jnnp.2008.155978
摘要
Objectives
The aim of the DiaFu study was to evaluate effectiveness and safety of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in patients with diabetic foot wounds in clinical practice. Design
In this controlled clinical superiority trial with blinded outcome assessment patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio stratified by study site and ulcer severity grade using a web-based-tool. Setting
This German national study was conducted in 40 surgical and internal medicine inpatient and outpatient facilities specialised in diabetes foot care. Participants
368 patients were randomised and 345 participants were included in the modified intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Adult patients suffering from a diabetic foot ulcer at least for 4 weeks and without contraindication for NPWT were allowed to be included. Interventions
NPWT was compared with standard moist wound care (SMWC) according to local standards and guidelines. Primary and secondary outcome measures
Primary outcome was wound closure within 16 weeks. Secondary outcomes were wound-related and treatment-related adverse events (AEs), amputations, time until optimal wound bed preparation, wound size and wound tissue composition, pain and quality of life (QoL) within 16 weeks, and recurrences and wound closure within 6 months. Results
In the ITT population, neither the wound closure rate (difference: n=4 (2.5% (95% CI−4.7% – 9.7%); p=0.53)) nor the time to wound closure (p=0.244) was significantly different between the treatment arms. 191 participants (NPWT 127; SMWC 64) had missing endpoint documentations, premature therapy ends or unauthorised treatment changes. 96 participants in the NPWT arm and 72 participants in the SMWC arm had at least one AE (p=0.007), but only 16 AEs were related to NPWT. Conclusions
NPWT was not superior to SMWC in diabetic foot wounds in German clinical practice. Overall, wound closure rate was low. Documentation deficits and deviations from treatment guidelines negatively impacted the outcome wound closure. Trial registration numbers
NCT01480362 and DRKS00003347.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI