Explainable Machine Learning Model for Predicting GI Bleed Mortality in the Intensive Care Unit

医学 重症监护室 置信区间 接收机工作特性 曲线下面积 流血 重症监护 急诊医学 重症监护医学 机器学习 内科学 外科 计算机科学
作者
Farah Deshmukh,Shamel S. Merchant
出处
期刊:The American Journal of Gastroenterology [American College of Gastroenterology]
卷期号:115 (10): 1657-1668 被引量:90
标识
DOI:10.14309/ajg.0000000000000632
摘要

INTRODUCTION: Acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleed is a common reason for hospitalization with 2%–10% risk of mortality. In this study, we developed a machine learning (ML) model to calculate the risk of mortality in intensive care unit patients admitted for GI bleed and compared it with APACHE IVa risk score. We used explainable ML methods to provide insight into the model's prediction and outcome. METHODS: We analyzed the patient data in the Electronic Intensive Care Unit Collaborative Research Database and extracted data for 5,691 patients (mean age = 67.4 years; 61% men) admitted with GI bleed. The data were used in training a ML model to identify patients who died in the intensive care unit. We compared the predictive performance of the ML model with the APACHE IVa risk score. Performance was measured by area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis. This study also used explainable ML methods to provide insights into the model's outcome or prediction using the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) method. RESULTS: The ML model performed better than the APACHE IVa risk score in correctly classifying the low-risk patients. The ML model had a specificity of 27% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 25–36) at a sensitivity of 100% compared with the APACHE IVa score, which had a specificity of 4% (95% CI: 3–31) at a sensitivity of 100%. The model identified patients who died with an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80–0.90) in the internal validation set, whereas the APACHE IVa clinical scoring systems identified patients who died with AUC values of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.73–0.86) with P value <0.001. DISCUSSION: We developed a ML model that predicts the mortality in patients with GI bleed with a greater accuracy than the current scoring system. By making the ML model explainable, clinicians would be able to better understand the reasoning behind the outcome.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Michael_li完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
小七2022完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
八八九九九1完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
luluyang完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
6秒前
历史真相完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
ycd完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
完美世界应助花尽采纳,获得10
11秒前
今年我必胖20斤完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
du完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
9202211125完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
满意元枫完成签到 ,获得积分10
16秒前
魁梧的觅松完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
武渊思完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
蓝色花生豆完成签到,获得积分0
17秒前
苗条盼山完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
wnll完成签到,获得积分0
18秒前
yunxiao完成签到 ,获得积分10
18秒前
ckeong89应助机智的然然采纳,获得30
19秒前
神外王001完成签到 ,获得积分10
20秒前
二丙完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
MARGARET完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
王忘汪完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
阿曼尼完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
daggeraxe完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
star完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
11完成签到,获得积分20
23秒前
飞翔的小鸟完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
Auriga完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
molly完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
ChemHu完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
28秒前
无奈白竹完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
shining完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
lemon完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
161319141完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
31秒前
hhhh完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
lu完成签到,获得积分0
31秒前
不知道叫个啥完成签到 ,获得积分10
32秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Aerospace Standards Index - 2026 ASIN2026 2000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
晋绥日报合订本24册(影印本1986年)【1940年9月–1949年5月】 1000
Social Cognition: Understanding People and Events 1000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6034756
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7746260
关于积分的说明 16206414
捐赠科研通 5181069
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2772925
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1756059
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1640893