医学
四分位间距
脑电双频指数
麻醉
镇静
谵妄
麻醉剂
随机对照试验
发作性谵妄
异丙酚
咪唑安定
镇静剂
外科
重症监护医学
七氟醚
作者
Charles H. Brown,Charles C. Edwards,Charles Lin,Emily Jones,Lisa R. Yanek,Melody Esmaili,Yara Gorashi,Richard Skelton,Daniel Kaganov,Ryan A. Curto,Noah L Lessing,Stephanie Cha,Elizabeth Colantuoni,Karin J. Neufeld,Frederick E. Sieber,Clayton L. Dean,Charles W. Hogue
出处
期刊:Anesthesiology
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2021-12-01
卷期号:135 (6): 992-1003
被引量:12
标识
DOI:10.1097/aln.0000000000004015
摘要
BACKGROUND Reducing depth of anesthesia and anesthetic exposure may help prevent delirium, but trials have been conflicting. Most studies were conducted under general anesthesia or in cognitively impaired patients. It is unclear whether reducing depth of anesthesia beyond levels consistent with general anesthesia reduces delirium in cognitively intact patients. The authors' objective was to determine whether a bundled approach to reduce anesthetic agent exposure as determined by Bispectral Index (BIS) values (spinal anesthesia with targeted sedation based on BIS values) compared with general anesthesia (masked BIS) reduces delirium. METHODS Important eligibility criteria for this parallel-arm randomized trial were patients 65 yr or greater undergoing lumbar spine fusion. The intervention group received spinal anesthesia with targeted sedation to BIS greater than 60 to 70. The control group received general anesthesia (masked BIS). The primary outcome was delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method daily through postoperative day 3, with blinded assessment. RESULTS The median age of 217 patients in the analysis was 72 (interquartile range, 69 to 77). The median BIS value in the spinal anesthesia with targeted sedation based on BIS values group was 62 (interquartile range, 53 to 70) and in the general anesthesia with masked BIS values group was 45 (interquartile range, 41 to 50; P < 0.001). Incident delirium was not different in the spinal anesthesia with targeted sedation based on BIS values group (25.2% [28 of 111] vs. the general anesthesia with masked BIS values group (18.9% [20 of 106]; P = 0.259; relative risk, 1.22 [95% CI, 0.85 to 1.76]). In prespecified subgroup analyses, the effect of anesthetic strategy differed according to the Mini-Mental State Examination, but not the Charlson Comorbidity Index or age. Two strokes occurred among patients receiving spinal anesthesia and one death among patients receiving general anesthesia. CONCLUSIONS Spinal anesthesia with targeted sedation based on BIS values compared with general anesthesia with masked BIS values did not reduce delirium after lumbar fusion. EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI