医学
远程医疗
委派
报销
神经学
课程
急性中风
冲程(发动机)
医疗急救
培训(气象学)
模式
研究生医学教育
医学教育
医疗保健
护理部
急诊科
心理学
机械工程
物理
精神科
气象学
工程类
教育学
社会科学
社会学
经济
经济增长
作者
Amy Guzik,Amanda Jagolino‐Cole,Christina Mijalski Sells,Andrew M. Southerland,Oana M. Dumitrascu,Anirudh Sreekrishnan,Sharyl Martini,Brett C. Meyer
出处
期刊:Stroke
[Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
日期:2024-10-02
标识
DOI:10.1161/strokeaha.124.047826
摘要
Telemedicine for stroke (Telestroke) has been a key component to efficient, widespread acute stroke care for many years. The expansion of reimbursement through the Furthering Access to Stroke Telemedicine Act and rapid deployment of telemedicine resources during the COVID-19 public health emergency have further expanded remote care, with practitioners of varying educational backgrounds, and experience providing acute stroke care via telemedicine (Telestroke). Some Telestroke practitioners have not had fellowship-level vascular neurology training and many are without training specific to virtual modalities. While many vascular neurology fellowship programs incorporate Telestroke training into the curriculum, components of this curriculum are not consistent, extent of involvement is variable, and not all fellows receive hands-on training in remote care. Furthermore, the extent of training and evaluation of Telestroke in American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology training requirements and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education assessments for vascular neurology fellowship are not standardized. We suggest that Telestroke be formally incorporated into vascular neurology fellowship curricula and provide considerations for key components of this training and metrics for evaluation.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI