Shared decision-making in persons living with dementia: A scoping review

奇纳 痴呆 包裹体(矿物) 心理学 医疗保健 认知 老年学 医学 护理部 心理干预 社会心理学 精神科 疾病 病理 经济 经济增长
作者
Meghan Mattos,Jessie S. Gibson,Dan Wilson,Laura Jepson,Soojung Ahn,Ishan Williams
出处
期刊:Dementia [SAGE]
卷期号:22 (4): 875-909 被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1177/14713012231156976
摘要

Evidence supports that older adults with cognitive impairment can reliably communicate their values and choices, even as cognition may decline. Shared decision-making, including the patient, family members, and healthcare providers, is critical to patient-centered care. The aim of this scoping review was to synthesize what is known about shared decision-making in persons living with dementia. A scoping review was completed in PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Keywords included content areas of dementia and shared decision-making. Inclusion criteria were as follows: description of shared or cooperative decision making, cognitively impaired patient population, adult patient, and original research. Review articles were excluded, as well as those for which the formal healthcare provider was the only team member involved in the decision-making (e.g., physician), and/or the patient sample was not cognitively impaired. Systematically extracted data were organized in a table, compared, and synthesized. The search yielded 263 non-duplicate articles that were screened by title and abstract. Ninety-three articles remained, and the full text was reviewed; 32 articles were eligible for this review. Studies were from across Europe (n = 23), North America (n = 7), and Australia (n = 2). The majority of the articles used a qualitative study design, and 10 used a quantitative study design. Categories of similar shared decision-making topics emerged, including health promotion, end-of-life, advanced care planning, and housing decisions. The majority of articles focused on shared decision-making regarding health promotion for the patient (n = 16). Findings illustrate that shared decision-making requires deliberate effort and is preferred among family members, healthcare providers, and patients with dementia. Future research should include more robust efficacy testing of decision-making tools, incorporation of evidence-based shared decisionmaking approaches based on cognitive status/diagnosis, and consideration of geographical/cultural differences in healthcare delivery systems.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
清茗完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
pwy完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
luffy完成签到 ,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
独特花卷发布了新的文献求助30
7秒前
11秒前
情怀应助19767588采纳,获得10
11秒前
文章多多完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
54132123完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
Calor完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
Apple完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
19767588完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
李健的小迷弟应助mx采纳,获得10
18秒前
吉兴坤完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
22秒前
24秒前
19767588发布了新的文献求助10
26秒前
SciGPT应助醉熏的笑萍采纳,获得10
27秒前
爆米花应助a7662888采纳,获得10
29秒前
31秒前
叾屾完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
高兴静枫发布了新的文献求助10
37秒前
41秒前
佳雪儿完成签到,获得积分10
45秒前
46秒前
47秒前
吕吕完成签到,获得积分10
47秒前
幽默的谷梦完成签到,获得积分10
47秒前
李健应助llihau采纳,获得10
48秒前
zeroayanami0发布了新的文献求助10
51秒前
斯文败类应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
51秒前
51秒前
shinysparrow应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
52秒前
打打应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
52秒前
shinysparrow应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
52秒前
Hello应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
52秒前
思源应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
52秒前
shinysparrow应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
52秒前
高分求助中
请在求助之前详细阅读求助说明!!!! 20000
One Man Talking: Selected Essays of Shao Xunmei, 1929–1939 1000
The Three Stars Each: The Astrolabes and Related Texts 900
Yuwu Song, Biographical Dictionary of the People's Republic of China 700
[Lambert-Eaton syndrome without calcium channel autoantibodies] 520
Bernd Ziesemer - Maos deutscher Topagent: Wie China die Bundesrepublik eroberte 500
A radiographic standard of reference for the growing knee 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2471499
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2138063
关于积分的说明 5448239
捐赠科研通 1862029
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 926029
版权声明 562747
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 495308