Shared decision-making in persons living with dementia: A scoping review

奇纳 痴呆 包裹体(矿物) 心理学 医疗保健 认知 老年学 医学 护理部 心理干预 社会心理学 精神科 疾病 病理 经济 经济增长
作者
Meghan Mattos,Jessie S. Gibson,Dan Wilson,Laura Jepson,Soojung Ahn,Ishan Williams
出处
期刊:Dementia [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:22 (4): 875-909 被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1177/14713012231156976
摘要

Evidence supports that older adults with cognitive impairment can reliably communicate their values and choices, even as cognition may decline. Shared decision-making, including the patient, family members, and healthcare providers, is critical to patient-centered care. The aim of this scoping review was to synthesize what is known about shared decision-making in persons living with dementia. A scoping review was completed in PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Keywords included content areas of dementia and shared decision-making. Inclusion criteria were as follows: description of shared or cooperative decision making, cognitively impaired patient population, adult patient, and original research. Review articles were excluded, as well as those for which the formal healthcare provider was the only team member involved in the decision-making (e.g., physician), and/or the patient sample was not cognitively impaired. Systematically extracted data were organized in a table, compared, and synthesized. The search yielded 263 non-duplicate articles that were screened by title and abstract. Ninety-three articles remained, and the full text was reviewed; 32 articles were eligible for this review. Studies were from across Europe (n = 23), North America (n = 7), and Australia (n = 2). The majority of the articles used a qualitative study design, and 10 used a quantitative study design. Categories of similar shared decision-making topics emerged, including health promotion, end-of-life, advanced care planning, and housing decisions. The majority of articles focused on shared decision-making regarding health promotion for the patient (n = 16). Findings illustrate that shared decision-making requires deliberate effort and is preferred among family members, healthcare providers, and patients with dementia. Future research should include more robust efficacy testing of decision-making tools, incorporation of evidence-based shared decisionmaking approaches based on cognitive status/diagnosis, and consideration of geographical/cultural differences in healthcare delivery systems.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
坚定的傲易完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
南涧居完成签到 ,获得积分20
2秒前
jiang发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
迷路月光发布了新的文献求助20
4秒前
Selena完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
Jason发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
5秒前
辉爱慧发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
刘6完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
小蘑菇应助assumpsit采纳,获得10
7秒前
fennie完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
所所应助缘起采纳,获得10
7秒前
黑米粥发布了新的文献求助30
8秒前
事已至此已成人喵完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
叶qing完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
乐乐应助知止采纳,获得10
11秒前
shanshan发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
Ferry完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
11秒前
Elite完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
嘻嘻喜欢笑嘻嘻完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
科研通AI6.4应助liuxia采纳,获得10
13秒前
rowena完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
14秒前
1010发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
16秒前
16秒前
16秒前
18秒前
dq1992发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
XYZONE发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
小二郎应助平凡采纳,获得10
19秒前
19秒前
19秒前
19秒前
天天快乐应助知止采纳,获得10
19秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Development of a Bridge Weigh-In-Motion System: A technology to convert the bridge response to the passage of traffic into data on vehicle configurations, speeds, times of travel and weights 1000
Current concepts in cutaneous toxicity : proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Cutaneous Toxicity, Washington, D.C., May 9-11, 1979 1000
ズームレンズの光学設計に関する研究 800
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 700
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7280616
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8901615
关于积分的说明 18829851
捐赠科研通 6952545
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3207396
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2377680
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2182514