Evaluation of ChatGPT‐4, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot in Generating Nursing Diagnoses Based on NANDA‐I Taxonomy II: A Comparative Cross‐Sectional Study

作者
Metin Tuncer,Turgay Yalcinkaya
出处
期刊:International Nursing Review [Wiley]
卷期号:72 (4): e70135-e70135
标识
DOI:10.1111/inr.70135
摘要

ABSTRACT Aim To evaluate the capability of large language models to generate nursing diagnoses based on NANDA‐I Taxonomy II and assess their performance across domains and overall. Background Large language models are emerging tools in nursing, showing potential to aid in diagnosis generation and education. However, their accuracy and applicability in clinical and educational settings remain underexplored. Methods This cross‐sectional comparative study used 10 realistic patient scenarios based on NANDA‐I Taxonomy II, covering 12 domains. The study aimed to evaluate the capability of four models to generate nursing diagnoses based on patient scenarios. The responses were assessed by five nursing experts for accuracy and alignment with NANDA‐I Taxonomy II in a single‐blind evaluation process. Results All models demonstrated similar performance across different domains and overall, with Claude attaining the highest overall performance score. Expert evaluations indicated moderate interrater reliability. Discussion Small variations between models and occasional omissions suggest that expert review is still required before clinical use. Conclusions Large language models are not yet sufficiently reliable for independent use in clinical settings and nursing education. Their application as supportive tools necessitates a cautious approach. Moreover, the development of specialized models designed to address the unique demands of the nursing field would be advantageous. Implications for nursing When large language models are used in nursing practice, their limitations should be considered, and the outputs they produce should be verified by nurses. Implications for nursing policy Ensuring the safe integration of artificial intelligence tools into nursing necessitates the establishment of robust regulatory policies to safeguard patient safety, the deployment of effective systems to monitor models’ performance, and the development of comprehensive guidelines and training programs.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
典雅以南发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
briefyark应助七个小矮人采纳,获得30
1秒前
点子完成签到,获得积分20
2秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
觉觉发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
义气的思松完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
机智的lan完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
WYQ发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
阿宝完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
小文发布了新的文献求助30
5秒前
6秒前
素心完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
活泼的世平完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
Ava应助典雅以南采纳,获得10
7秒前
8秒前
Yu完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
善学以致用应助点子采纳,获得10
8秒前
WYQ完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
李爱国应助玩命的萃采纳,获得10
10秒前
脑洞疼应助nene123采纳,获得10
10秒前
Annieqqiu发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
10秒前
蝶步韶华发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
受伤破茧发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
大个应助zhou采纳,获得10
11秒前
lllll完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
lsyy发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
ltz应助小明采纳,获得10
12秒前
YZZ发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
kwok发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
潇洒斑马发布了新的文献求助30
14秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
大模型应助自由的元冬采纳,获得10
14秒前
依妍完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助30
14秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Introduction to strong mixing conditions volume 1-3 5000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 2000
从k到英国情人 1500
Ägyptische Geschichte der 21.–30. Dynastie 1100
„Semitische Wissenschaften“? 1100
Russian Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5729040
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5315724
关于积分的说明 15315600
捐赠科研通 4876049
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2619186
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1568758
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1525247