嗜睡症
医学
睡眠麻痹
不利影响
中止
耐受性
安慰剂
失眠症
随机对照试验
睡眠障碍
相对风险
内科学
白天过度嗜睡
置信区间
精神科
莫达非尼
替代医学
病理
作者
H. Na,Nakyung Jeon,Christine E. Staatz,Nayoung Han,In‐hwan Baek
出处
期刊:Sleep
[Oxford University Press]
日期:2023-11-09
卷期号:47 (2)
被引量:8
标识
DOI:10.1093/sleep/zsad293
摘要
Abstract Study Objectives Dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) are emerging treatments for insomnia. This meta-analysis study aimed to assess the safety of FDA-approved DORAs (suvorexant, lemborexant, and daridorexant), focusing on narcolepsy-like symptoms associated with these drugs. Methods Five prominent databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on this topic. Primary safety outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), treatment-related TEAEs, TEAEs leading to discontinuation, and serious TEAEs. Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS), sleep paralysis, and hallucinations were categorized as adverse events (AEs)-related narcolepsy-like symptoms. Results Eleven RCTs with 7703 patients were included. DORAs were associated with a higher risk of TEAEs (risk ratio [RR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 1.15) and treatment-related TEAEs (RR, 1.69; 95% CI: 1.49 to 1.92) when compared to placebo. The DORA group exhibited a significantly higher risk of EDS (RR, 2.15; 95% CI: 1.02 to 4.52) and sleep paralysis (RR, 3.40; 95% CI: 1.18 to 9.80) compared to the placebo group. Conclusion This meta-analysis achieved a comparative evaluation of the clinical safety and tolerability of FDA-approved DORAs for primary insomnia, specifically focusing on AEs-related narcolepsy-like symptoms. This study contributes to understanding the safety profile of FDA-approved DORAs for treating insomnia.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI