EAO Position Paper: Immediate Implant Placement: Managing Hard and Soft Tissue Stability from Diagnosis to Prosthetic Treatment

In this position paper, the state of the art in immediate implant placement (IIP) at incisor-cuspid-premolar sites is described. The literature supports that the following prerequisites need to be simultaneously met for a predictable outcome: (1) there must be no acute infection; (2) there must be apical and palatal/lingual bone for implant anchorage; (3) the tooth must be inside the bone envelope; (4) the alveolar socket must have a favorable morphology (type I, IIa, IIb avoiding wide dehiscences); (5) there must be no midfacial recession; (6) the right implant must be selected; and (7) the surgeon needs to be experienced and skilled. A preoperative CBCT is required for IIP because multiple aforementioned prerequisites (2, 3, and 4) can only be assessed on the basis of 3D imaging. The final prerequisite relates to the importance of a perfect implant position, preferably leaving a horizontal gap of at least 2 mm between the implant shoulder and buccal bone wall. Guided surgery is preferred over free-hand surgery to accomplish this. Flapless surgery, socket grafting, connective tissue graft (CTG), and immediate provisionalization have been shown to contribute to hard and/or soft tissue stability. When the previously mentioned prerequisites are fulfilled, IIP may be considered over alternative treatment concepts (eg, early implant placement [EIP] and delayed implant placement [DIP]) based on time gain, minimal invasiveness, and similar outcomes in the literature. Given very strict selection criteria, clinicians should primarily screen patients for IIP before considering other treatment options with wider indications. Int J Prosthodont 2023;36:533-545.