医学
骨关节炎
物理疗法
物理医学与康复
运动疗法
替代医学
外科
随机对照试验
病理
作者
Travis Haber,Belinda J. Lawford,Kim L. Bennell,Melanie Holden,Daniel K. White,Rana S. Hinman
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jphys.2025.06.010
摘要
This review highlighted six themes formulated as questions: Is exercise as effective as previously thought? How does exercise work and who might benefit the most? Is there an optimal exercise dose and type? Can patient adherence be improved - and does it matter? Do patients need to be seen in person to deliver exercise? How does communication about osteoarthritis influence patient beliefs about exercise? There were several key findings related to these themes. First, there was reduced certainty in the effectiveness of exercise for knee OA. Additionally, the mechanisms by which exercise improves clinical outcomes are largely unknown and it is unclear which individuals benefit the most from exercise. Research has failed to demonstrate a dose-response relationship between exercise and clinical outcomes and improving patient adherence to exercise may not lead to improved clinical outcomes. Nonetheless, exercise therapy can be effectively delivered remotely via a variety of methods. Communicating about OA using an impairment-based approach has been causally linked to negative beliefs about exercise.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI