Endobronchial Ultrasound Transbronchial Needle Aspiration With a 19-Gauge Needle vs 21- and 22-Gauge Needles for Mediastinal Lymphadenopathy

医学 结节病 放射科 纵隔淋巴结病 淋巴瘤 支气管内超声 核医学 逻辑回归 倾向得分匹配 活检 内科学 支气管镜检查
作者
Nicholas P. J. Romatowski,Ashley‐Mae Gillson,Daniel Stollery,Elaine Dumoulin,Erik Vakil,Inderdeep Dhaliwal,Paul MacEachern,Christopher A. Hergott,Chung Chun Tyan,Michael A. Mitchell,Colin Schieman,Marc Fortin,Alain Tremblay
出处
期刊:Chest [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:162 (3): 712-720 被引量:23
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2022.03.041
摘要

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is commonly used to evaluate mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Studies focusing on malignant lymphadenopathy have compared 21- and 22-gauge (21G and 22G, respectively) needles and have not identified an advantage of one needle size over the other in terms of diagnostic yield.Does the 19-gauge (19G) EBUS needle offer greater diagnostic yield and sensitivity vs the 21G and 22G EBUS needles for a diagnosis of sarcoidosis, lymphoma, or mediastinal lymphadenopathy not yet diagnosed?This study retrospectively examined records of 730 patients from the Stather Canadian Outcomes Registry for Chest Procedures (SCOPE) database who underwent EBUS-TBNA for a diagnosis of suspected sarcoidosis, lymphoma, or mediastinal lymphadenopathy not yet diagnosed. A propensity score analysis of two groups was performed. One group comprised patients undergoing EBUS-TBNA with a 19G needle, the other with a 21G or 22G needle. Cases for analysis were selected with a 1:2 ratio of 19G vs 21/22G using logistic regression and random matching with all eligible 19G cases included.There were 137 patients (312 targets) in the 19G group and 274 patients (631 targets) in the 21/22G group in the propensity score analysis. The diagnostic yield was 107 of 137 (78.1%) in the 19G group vs 194 of 274 (70.8%) in the 21/22G group (difference, 7.3%; 95% CI, -1.9 to 15.6; P = .116). The sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA for sarcoidosis was 80 of 83 (96.4%) in the 19G group vs 150 of 156 (96.2%) in the 21/22G group (difference, 0.24%; 95% CI, -6.6 to 85.1; P = .93). In patients with a final diagnosis of lymphoma, EBUS was diagnostic in 10 of 13 (76.9%) in the 19G group vs 12 of 12 (100%) in the 21/22G group (difference, 23.1%; 95% CI, -5.4 to 50.3; P = .08).The study did not identify an advantage of the 19G EBUS needle over the 21/22G EBUS needles for diagnostic yield nor sensitivity for sarcoidosis or lymphoma.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
cdercder应助叮叮车采纳,获得10
刚刚
刚刚
刚刚
1秒前
chen发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
goose完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
三木发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
我是老大应助LUKE采纳,获得10
3秒前
漫漫完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
Canonical_SMILES完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
不吃香菜完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
逗逗完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
阿紫发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
倩Q完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
Ah发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
jimingxiang完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
ele完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
hhonghahei发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
ying发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
zyz给zyz的求助进行了留言
10秒前
吴彦祖发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
Kao应助土豆采纳,获得10
11秒前
12秒前
科研通AI2S应助欣慰的乘风采纳,获得10
12秒前
lemon完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
4u发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
吴彦祖完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
大大怪完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
端庄的凌旋完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
柠木发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
zho应助anvijen采纳,获得10
17秒前
WF发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
zz应助Andomia采纳,获得30
18秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
48V Low-voltage Power Distribution Network (PDN) Architecture Industry Report, 2024 800
ズームレンズの光学設計に関する研究 800
Fundamentals of Pharmaceutical and Biologics Regulations: A Global Perspective, Second Edition 700
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 610
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7300378
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8918699
关于积分的说明 18888229
捐赠科研通 6965211
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3211106
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2380360
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2187852