奇纳
斯科普斯
包裹体(矿物)
医疗保健
护理部
焦点小组
定性研究
批判性评价
卫生专业人员
心理学
梅德林
医学教育
医学
替代医学
心理干预
社会学
政治学
社会心理学
社会科学
病理
人类学
法学
作者
Piiku Pakkanen,Arja Häggman‐Laitila,Mari Kangasniemi
标识
DOI:10.1080/13561820.2021.1892612
摘要
The aim of this study was to synthesize previous knowledge about ethics in nurses' interprofessional collaboration in clinical practice. Although healthcare professionals have common goals and shared values, ethical conflicts still arise during patient care. We carried out a meta-synthesis of peer-reviewed papers published in any language from 2013–2019, using both electronic searches, with the CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus, and SocINDEX databases, and manual searches. We identified 4,763 papers and selected six qualitative papers, and three theoretical papers, based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria and quality appraisal. The studies came from the USA, Canada, Sweden, Australia, Botswana, and the Netherlands. We found that in ethics studies on nurses' interprofessional collaboration in clinical practice the focus has been on factors that affect how patients receive care. These factors were patients' wishes, whether they were told the truth about their condition, and how different professionals recognized and treated their pain. The focus in the papers we reviewed was on the roles of different professionals during the care process, including ethical conflicts with regard to their aims, commitment, and the balance of power among them and other professions. More research is needed to raise the visibility of how nurses and other professionals recognize, and evaluate, their professional and interprofessional ethics.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI