The PHASES score: To treat or not to treat? Retrospective evaluation of the risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

医学 蛛网膜下腔出血 动脉瘤 回顾性队列研究 弗雷明翰风险评分 外科 放射科 内科学 疾病
作者
Igor Pagiola,Cristian Mihalea,Jildaz Caroff,Léon Ikka,Vanessa Chalumeau,Marta Iacobucci,Augustin Ozanne,Sophie Gallas,Marcio Chaves Marques,Dárcio Nalli,Henrique Carrete,José Guilherme Mendes Pereira Caldas,Michel Eli Frudit,Jacques Moret,Laurent Spelle
出处
期刊:Journal of Neuroradiology [Elsevier]
卷期号:47 (5): 349-352 被引量:34
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.neurad.2019.06.003
摘要

The PHASES score was formulated to predict the 5-year risk of rupture for intracranial aneurysms. We retrospectively analyzed all patients treated in our institution for aneurysmal SAH and applied the PHASES score to estimate the probable predicted risk of bleeding in this group of patients. Between February 2015 and August 2018, all patients with aneurysmal SAH were retrospectively analyzed and the PHASES score was applied. A total of 155 patients were included with a mean age of 53.8 years, including 60 males and 95 females. Of our patients 110 (70.9%) had a PHASES score of below or equal to 5, with a hemorrhagic risk of up to 1.3% over 5 years. If we analyze the patients with a risk of below 2% this figure increases to 122 patients (78.7%). Of these 99.3% were European and 0.6% were Japanese (1 patient). In 86 patients (55.4%), the aneurysm was smaller than 5 mm and in 10 patients (6.4%) the aneurysm was located in the posterior circulation. Of our patients 78.7% had less than a 2% 5-year rupture risk based on their PHASES score, highlighting the discrepancy of the rupture risk calculated with the PHASES score when hypothetically applied to this group of patients. In the hypothetical scenario that our patients had unruptured aneurysms, our retrospective analysis shows that the PHASES score may only provide a weak tool for clinicians to use in the decision-making process as to whether or not to treat these aneurysms.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
无限不正发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
2秒前
明亮不乐完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
子非鱼丶完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
温医第一打野完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
辞清完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
Akim应助gg2002采纳,获得10
5秒前
JamesPei应助luo采纳,获得30
5秒前
yjy发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
7秒前
WASD完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
俊逸的可乐完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
thw发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
机灵的冰淇淋完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
10秒前
voifhpg发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助海野海月采纳,获得10
11秒前
一叶发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
典雅的静发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
axdkid完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
thw完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
RYCrystal完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
18秒前
19秒前
小狐狸发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
22秒前
Hao应助syf000128采纳,获得10
22秒前
24秒前
Chenglx完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
丘比特应助司徒明雪采纳,获得30
25秒前
SOLOMON应助SharoN采纳,获得10
27秒前
28秒前
忍忍完成签到,获得积分20
32秒前
32秒前
WT完成签到 ,获得积分20
33秒前
毛毛发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
高分求助中
【本贴是提醒信息,请勿应助】请在求助之前详细阅读求助说明!!!! 20000
comprehensive molecular insect science 1000
One Man Talking: Selected Essays of Shao Xunmei, 1929–1939 1000
The Three Stars Each: The Astrolabes and Related Texts 900
Yuwu Song, Biographical Dictionary of the People's Republic of China 800
Multifunctional Agriculture, A New Paradigm for European Agriculture and Rural Development 600
Challenges, Strategies, and Resiliency in Disaster and Risk Management 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2481528
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2144233
关于积分的说明 5468925
捐赠科研通 1866744
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 927751
版权声明 563039
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 496382