Loneliness, Social Isolation, and Living Alone Associations With Mortality Risk in Individuals Living With Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression

孤独 荟萃分析 社会孤立 心理信息 危险系数 医学 出版偏见 社会支持 系统回顾 老年学 置信区间 人口学 相对风险 梅德林 心理学 内科学 精神科 社会心理学 生物 社会学 生物化学
作者
Róisín M. Long,Antonio Terracciano,Angelina R. Sutin,Ann‐Marie Creaven,Denis Gerstorf,Sinéad D’Arcy-Bewick,Páraic S. O’Súilleabháin
出处
期刊:Psychosomatic Medicine [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:85 (1): 8-17 被引量:8
标识
DOI:10.1097/psy.0000000000001151
摘要

This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of associations between loneliness, social isolation, and living alone and risk of mortality among individuals with established cardiovascular disease.Five electronic databases were searched (MEDLINE [Ovid], PsycINFO, EMBASE, PubMed, and SCOPUS) from inception to November 25, 2021. In all, 35 studies were included in a narrative synthesis and, where appropriate, a meta-analytic evaluation using a random-effects model.Living alone was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality ( k = 15, n = 80,243, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.20-1.83, I2 = 83%), and meta-regressions found that the effects were stronger in studies from Europe and with longer follow-up. However, there was evidence of publication bias. Social isolation was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality, measured both as a dichotomous variable ( k = 3, n = 2648, HR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.08-2.04, I2 = 31%) and as a continuous variable ( k = 5, n = 2388, HR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.02-1.24, I2 = 51%). Meta-analysis was not feasible for loneliness as exposure, but narrative synthesis of four studies suggested a tentative association between loneliness and increased risk of all-cause mortality.Supporting public health concerns, our review finds that loneliness, social isolation, and living alone are associated with premature mortality among individuals with established cardiovascular disease. However, evidence of publication bias and large methodological differences across studies point to the need for more rigorous research.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
健壮的太君完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
马上动起来完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
刚刚
刘小胖完成签到,获得积分20
刚刚
1秒前
DT完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
Autor应助小趴菜采纳,获得10
2秒前
PDL完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
Wwww发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
糊涂的雪旋完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
前路完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
甜豆包完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
脑洞疼应助花木宝宝采纳,获得10
3秒前
桐桐应助苏沐采纳,获得10
3秒前
六眼飞鱼完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
叶子完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
Lucas应助花开半夏采纳,获得10
5秒前
PDL发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
齐齐发布了新的文献求助30
6秒前
十一完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
ZoeZhang完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
完美世界应助哈哈采纳,获得10
6秒前
小离完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
Inspiring完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
9秒前
猪友完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
qiaokizhang发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
kaka1981sdu完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
css1997完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
Mr.zhou完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
yx完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
CodeCraft应助jscr采纳,获得10
10秒前
可可发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
Azur1完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
高分求助中
The three stars each : the Astrolabes and related texts 1070
Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 4 Volume Set (ASM Books) 13th Edition 1000
Boris Pesce - Gli impiegati della Fiat dal 1955 al 1999 un percorso nella memoria 500
[Lambert-Eaton syndrome without calcium channel autoantibodies] 500
少脉山油柑叶的化学成分研究 500
Recherches Ethnographiques sue les Yao dans la Chine du Sud 500
Aspect and Predication: The Semantics of Argument Structure 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2401689
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2101176
关于积分的说明 5298041
捐赠科研通 1828783
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 911582
版权声明 560333
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 487294