Switching to once-weekly insulin icodec versus once-daily insulin glargine U100 in individuals with basal-bolus insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (ONWARDS 4): a phase 3a, randomised, open-label, multicentre, treat-to-target, non-inferiority trial

医学 甘精胰岛素 胰岛素 基础胰岛素 糖尿病 2型糖尿病 打开标签 内科学 丸(消化) 1型糖尿病 随机对照试验 脱胶胰岛素 内分泌学 儿科
作者
Chantal Mathieu,Björg Ásbjörnsdóttir,Harpreet S. Bajaj,Wendy Lane,Ana Laura de Souza Almeida Matos,Sreenivasa Murthy,Karolina Stachlewska,Julio Rosenstock
出处
期刊:The Lancet [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:401 (10392): 1929-1940 被引量:132
标识
DOI:10.1016/s0140-6736(23)00520-2
摘要

Insulin icodec (icodec) is a basal insulin analogue suitable for once-weekly dosing. ONWARDS 4 aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of once-weekly icodec compared with once-daily insulin glargine U100 (glargine U100) in individuals with long-standing type 2 diabetes on a basal-bolus regimen.In this 26-week, phase 3a, randomised, open-label, multicentre, treat-to-target, non-inferiority trial, adults from 80 sites (outpatient clinics and hospital departments) across nine countries (Belgium, India, Italy, Japan, Mexico, the Netherlands, Romania, Russia, and the USA) with type 2 diabetes (glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c] 7·0-10·0%) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive once-weekly icodec or once-daily glargine U100 combined with 2-4 daily bolus insulin aspart injections. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c from baseline to week 26 (non-inferiority margin of 0·3 percentage points). The primary outcome was evaluated in the full analysis set (ie, all randomly assigned participants). Safety outcomes were evaluated in the safety analysis set (ie, all participants randomly assigned who received at least one dose of trial product). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04880850.Between May 14 and Oct 29, 2021, 746 participants were screened for eligibility, of whom 582 (78%) were randomly assigned (291 [50%] to icodec treatment and 291 [50%] to glargine U100 treatment). Participants had a mean duration of type 2 diabetes of 17·1 years (SD 8·4). At week 26, estimated mean change in HbA1c was -1·16 percentage points in the icodec group (baseline 8·29%) and -1·18 percentage points in the glargine U100 group (baseline 8·31%), showing non-inferiority for icodec versus glargine U100 (estimated treatment difference 0·02 percentage points [95% CI -0·11 to 0·15], p<0·0001). Overall, 171 (59%) of 291 participants in the icodec group and 167 (57%) of 291 participants in the glargine U100 group had an adverse event. 35 serious adverse events were reported in 22 (8%) of 291 participants in the icodec group and 33 serious adverse events were reported in 25 (9%) of 291 participants receiving glargine U100. Overall, combined level 2 and level 3 hypoglycaemia rates were similar between treatment groups. No new safety concerns were identified for icodec.In people with long-standing type 2 diabetes on a basal-bolus regimen, once-weekly icodec showed similar improvements in glycaemic control, with fewer basal insulin injections, lower bolus insulin dose, and with no increase in hypoglycaemic rates compared with once-daily glargine U100. Key strengths of this trial include the use of masked continous glucose monitoring; the high trial completion rate; and the inclusion of a large, diverse, and multinational population. Limitations include the relatively short trial duration and the open-label design.Novo Nordisk.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
bbbin完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
highlight完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
茫茫发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
在水一方应助ly采纳,获得10
刚刚
1秒前
1秒前
佳言2009发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
kk发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
李健应助微纳组刘同采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
清薇发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
星m发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
科研通AI6.2应助baopan采纳,获得30
4秒前
F__完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
三泥发布了新的文献求助20
4秒前
5秒前
zhanghao发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
雪落你看不见完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
HHHH发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
6秒前
quanquan完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
奥利给发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
刘露发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
7秒前
7秒前
csq69完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
充电宝应助Sunnig盈采纳,获得10
8秒前
充电宝应助安静的迎南采纳,获得10
8秒前
Hello应助chao采纳,获得10
9秒前
聪慧小海豚完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
tjr完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
wang发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
tr银完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
愉快的真发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
小墩子发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
13秒前
Hh完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
Dean完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
Xu发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
高分求助中
Principles of Economics, 11th Edition 10000
University Physics with Modern Physics, 16th edition 10000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis, 4th Edition 1000
Organic Reactions, Volume 116 1000
Current concepts in cutaneous toxicity : proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Cutaneous Toxicity, Washington, D.C., May 9-11, 1979 1000
The recovery-stress questionnaires : user manual 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7256940
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8878892
关于积分的说明 18753673
捐赠科研通 6937056
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3200928
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2375047
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2176572