心理学
灵活性(工程)
差别性影响
保守主义
政治
认知心理学
动机推理
实证经济学
政策分析
循证政策
光学(聚焦)
公共政策
公民自由
社会心理学
道德推理
儿童发展
影响评估
俱乐部
政策制定
幼儿
集合(抽象数据类型)
亲社会行为
发展心理学
对手
测量数据收集
作者
Aarthi K Popat,Jamie Amemiya,Gail D. Heyman,Caren M. Walker
摘要
= 333), participants were presented with a policy that indirectly discriminated against girls: A school club only admitted children with short hair, a characteristic that is statistically uncommon among girls. Without explicit evidence as to why this policy was made, children negatively evaluated the policy starting at 7 years old, and disapproval strengthened into later childhood and adulthood. However, when provided with a strong justification for the policy (i.e., the short-hair rule prevents harm), but not a justification with circular reasoning, both children's and adults' acceptance of the policy increased. Notably, political conservatism was also related to greater acceptance among adults. Taken together, this research supports the account that people flexibly evaluate disparate impact policies in response to context, and identifies strong justifications as a lever that promotes moral acceptance of such policies across development. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI