审查
输血
政府(语言学)
医学
家庭医学
政治学
法学
免疫学
语言学
哲学
作者
Michael Murphy,Susan R. Brailsford,David J. Roberts
出处
期刊:Blood
[American Society of Hematology]
日期:2025-02-12
卷期号:145 (15): 1601-1609
被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1182/blood.2024025976
摘要
Abstract The UK Infected Blood Inquiry report was published in May 2024 after 6 years of taking oral and written evidence from patients, clinicians, blood services, government officials, and politicians about the transmission of infection by blood transfusion to thousands of patients in the 1970s through to the 1990s. The same problems with transfusion-transmitted infection occurred in many other countries in the same period, but their reviews, inquiries, and decisions about compensation occurred many years earlier than in the United Kingdom. The publication of the report has been welcomed but begs 2 important questions. Why was the inquiry so delayed in the United Kingdom? And why did it take so long to report? Furthermore, the report itself deserves scrutiny. What were its findings and lessons learned? How will the findings be implemented, and what are the implications, if any, for other countries?
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI