Study of Whole blood in Frontline Trauma (SWiFT): implementation study protocol

医学 焦点小组 协议(科学) 血液成分 定性研究 输血 医疗急救 护理部 重症监护医学 急诊医学 外科 替代医学 病理 社会学 业务 营销 社会科学
作者
Grazia Antonacci,Allison Williams,Jessi L. Smith,Laura Green
出处
期刊:BMJ Open [BMJ]
卷期号:14 (2): e078953-e078953 被引量:1
标识
DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078953
摘要

Introduction Uncontrolled bleeding is a major cause of death for patients with major trauma. Current transfusion practices vary, and there is uncertainty about the optimal strategy. Whole blood (WB) transfusion, which contains all components in one bag, is considered potentially advantageous, particularly for resuscitating patients with major bleeding in the prehospital setting. It could potentially improve survival, reduce donor risk and simplify the processes of delivering blood transfusions outside hospitals. However, the evidence supporting the effectiveness and safety of WB compared with the standard separate blood component therapy is limited. A multicentre randomised controlled trial will be conducted, alongside an implementation study, to assess the efficacy, cost-effectiveness and implementation of prehospital WB transfusion in the prehospital environment. The implementation study will focus on evaluating the acceptability and integration of the intervention into clinical settings and on addressing broader contextual factors that may influence its success or failure. Methods and analysis A type 1 effectiveness–implementation hybrid design will be employed. The implementation study will use qualitative methods, encompassing comprehensive interviews and focus groups with operational staff, patients and blood donor representatives. Staff will be purposefully selected to ensure a wide range of perspectives based on their professional background and involvement in the WB pathway. The study design includes: (1) initial assessment of current practice and processes in the WB pathway; (2) qualitative interviews with up to 40 operational staff and (3) five focus groups with staff and donor representatives. Data analysis will be guided by the theoretical lenses of the Normalisation Process Theory and the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Ethics and dissemination The study was prospectively registered and approved by the South Central—Oxford C Research Ethics Committee and the Health Research Authority and Health and Care Research Wales. The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and provided to all relevant stakeholders. Trial registration number ISRCTN23657907 ; EudraCT: 2021-006876-18; IRAS Number: 300414; REC: 22/SC/0072.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
芒果发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
温暖的氮气完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
南风完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
4秒前
5秒前
丘比特应助xx-xxx采纳,获得10
5秒前
6秒前
sql发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
无花果应助温暖的氮气采纳,获得10
8秒前
8秒前
less因子完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
鱼梓发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
111发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
xiaolizi发布了新的文献求助80
10秒前
轻松的亦巧完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
起床做核酸完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
田様应助我也会吃饭采纳,获得20
13秒前
14秒前
完美世界应助朴素鸿煊采纳,获得10
14秒前
随遇而安完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
17秒前
busybuteasyy完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
典雅沛柔完成签到 ,获得积分10
17秒前
18秒前
早日毕业完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
李拜天发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
刘纳新关注了科研通微信公众号
21秒前
nx3rVX发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
迷人雪卉完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
十一发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
活力小笼包完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
称心雁完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
阿肥完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
在水一方应助杨艺采纳,获得10
27秒前
Lucas应助dff采纳,获得10
29秒前
生动的板栗完成签到,获得积分20
29秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Development Across Adulthood 1000
Chemistry and Physics of Carbon Volume 18 800
The formation of Australian attitudes towards China, 1918-1941 660
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
天津市智库成果选编 600
全相对论原子结构与含时波包动力学的理论研究--清华大学 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 物理 内科学 复合材料 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 电极 细胞生物学 基因 无机化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6449109
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8261995
关于积分的说明 17601735
捐赠科研通 5512252
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2902849
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1879944
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1721205