医学
淋巴水肿
腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣
外科
乳房再造术
乳腺癌
淋巴结
吻合
前瞻性队列研究
自由襟翼
显微外科
癌症
内科学
作者
Edward I. Chang,Amir Ibrahim,Jun Liu,Charee Robe,Hiroo Suami,Matthew M. Hanasono,Alexander T. Nguyen
标识
DOI:10.1097/prs.0000000000006634
摘要
Background: Patients with breast cancer–related lymphedema can be treated with a simultaneous deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap, vascularized inguinal lymph node transfer, and lymphovenous anastomosis for aesthetic breast reconstruction and lymphedema in one operation. Methods: The authors performed a comparison of prospectively followed patients who underwent free flap breast reconstruction with vascularized inguinal lymph node transfer and anastomosis to a retrospective cohort of patients who underwent free flap breast reconstruction with vascularized inguinal lymph node transfer alone. Results: Thirty-three patients underwent DIEP flap reconstruction with vascularized inguinal lymph node transfer and lymphovenous anastomosis, and 21 received a free flap with lymph node transfer alone. There were no significant differences in demographics, adjuvant chemotherapy, or radiation therapy. The average number of nodes removed was also equivalent (21.2 versus 21.4 nodes). Two anastomoses per patient, on average, were performed (range, one to four) in the combined cohort, and all patients (100 percent) reported a subjective improvement in symptoms, compared with 81.0 percent of patients undergoing only lymph node transfer ( p = 0.019). Perometer measurements demonstrated a significant reduction between the groups at early time points [3 months, 40.7 percent versus 20.0 percent ( p = 0.037); 6 months, 57.0 percent versus 44.5 percent ( p = 0.043)]; however, the difference was not statistically significant at 12 months (60.4 percent versus 57.8 percent; p = 0.43). Conclusion: This is the first prospective study demonstrating the safety and efficacy of a combined DIEP flap with vascularized inguinal lymph node transfer and lymphovenous anastomosis, which may be superior to lymph node transfer alone. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI