PD48-11 DECISIONAL CONFLICT IN PARENTS REGARDING NEWBORN CIRCUMCISION

作者
Hannah E. Botkin,Denise Juhr,Douglas W. Storm,Christopher S. Cooper,Gina A Lockwood
出处
期刊:The Journal of Urology [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:207 (Supplement 5)
标识
DOI:10.1097/ju.0000000000002616.11
摘要

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022PD48-11 DECISIONAL CONFLICT IN PARENTS REGARDING NEWBORN CIRCUMCISION Hannah Botkin, Denise Juhr, Douglas Storm, Christopher Cooper, and Gina Lockwood Hannah BotkinHannah Botkin More articles by this author , Denise JuhrDenise Juhr More articles by this author , Douglas StormDouglas Storm More articles by this author , Christopher CooperChristopher Cooper More articles by this author , and Gina LockwoodGina Lockwood More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002616.11AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Informed consent is obtained prior to circumcision of newborn males, but little is known about the degree of uncertainty parents experience surrounding the choice of whether or not to circumcise. We evaluated the degree of decisional conflict (DC) in parents of male children and children of unknown sex during the prenatal period. METHODS: We administered a validated questionnaire, the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), to pregnant mothers carrying a male child or child of unknown sex during prenatal care visits as well as to expecting parents via an institution-wide survey. DCS total score was calculated on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 representing no DC, and 100 representing extremely high DC. Total score, as well as uncertainty, informed, values clarity, support, and effective decision subscores were calculated. Decisional conflict was considered to be low with a score of less than 25, intermediate with scores between 25 and 37.5 and high with scores greater than 37.5. Unpaired t-test was used to compare results between groups. RESULTS: 153 DCS were completed and analyzed. All mothers approached for survey completion during prenatal visits completed the survey. 57.9% (n=88) of respondents reported they would choose circumcision for their male child, with 33% (n=51) choosing not to circumcise, and the remaining 8.6% (n=13) unsure about the choice. Mean total DCS score was higher (mean = 44.4, SD 11.9) for parents reporting they were unsure, than those who selected circumcision (mean = 12.9, SD 14.2; p <0.0001) or no circumcision (mean = 5.5, SD 8.7; p <0.0001). Mean scores were not significantly different from trimester to trimester, and the number of those unsure about the decision were spread evenly between the first, second and third trimesters. Subscale scores were all low for conflict in those who had decided on circumcision or against it. All subscale scores in the unsure group were high, with the highest being the uncertainty subscale (mean = 62.8, SD 15.8) and the values clarity subscale (mean = 48.1, SD 14.9). CONCLUSIONS: Our survey data showed that a small proportion of parents-to-be do experience high levels of DC regarding the decision of whether or not to circumcise. Importantly, some parents report not understanding the risks, benefits, and side effects of this procedure, as reflected in the informed subscore or understanding the relative importance of their own values in this decision, as reflected in the values clarity subscore. Better understanding of the modifiable factors contributing to this hesitancy could help providers alleviate conflict and regret regarding this decision. Source of Funding: None © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e803 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Hannah Botkin More articles by this author Denise Juhr More articles by this author Douglas Storm More articles by this author Christopher Cooper More articles by this author Gina Lockwood More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
黑眼圈完成签到 ,获得积分0
1秒前
飘逸冰岚发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
xing_xing给金毛大王的求助进行了留言
2秒前
xixi2517完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
lby发布了新的文献求助50
4秒前
4秒前
6秒前
9秒前
研友_VZG7GZ的应助被藜杖叩门采纳,获得10
10秒前
chengzi完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
粗心的棉花糖完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
充电宝的应助被宗笑晴采纳,获得10
12秒前
王哈哈发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
丘比特的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
13秒前
bkagyin的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
13秒前
斯文败类的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
13秒前
orixero的应助被娜比小新采纳,获得10
13秒前
大模型的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
13秒前
搜集达人的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
13秒前
丘比特的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
13秒前
脑洞疼的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
13秒前
Orange的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
aajhajkahna的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
aajhajkahna的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
Avon的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
14秒前
wanci的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
科研小菜鸡完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
李健的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
Chaos的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
英姑的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
orixero的应助被科研通管家采纳,获得10
15秒前
zeyi完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
科目三的应助被wxc采纳,获得10
17秒前
geo_xl完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
久睡成瘾完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
21秒前
小王发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
拉伸高分子熔体中缠结行为的模拟和小角中子散射研究 1080
Encyclopedia of Modern Artificial Intelligence 1000
Особенности технологий и методов информационно-психологических войн СССР с Великобританией и США в период 1939-1953 гг 1000
Das Matthäusevangelium: Kapitel 1:1–17 1000
Analyses de reconnaissances de dettes passées devant les échevins d'Ypres (1249-1291) 600
Cellulose and Cellulose Derivatives: Synthesis, Modification and Applications 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 计算机科学 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 人工智能 细胞生物学 无机化学 物理化学 数学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 8143360
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9542847
关于积分的说明 21653935
捐赠科研通 7728606
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3422020
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2547337
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2464829