Assessment of breast reconstruction with DIEP flaps

Reconstruction with a Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) flap is considered to be the first choice forautologous breast reconstruction. Skin and fat are transplanted from the lower abdomen to the chest were theblood vessels are reconnected through microsurgery. A total of 309 patients with unilateral DIEP flap and 23patients with expander prosthesis (EP) reconstructions were included in the present studies aimed at illustratingand optimizing breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap technique.We evaluated blood flow before and after indirect heating, as well as sensitivity to touch, cold and warmth in tenwomen with reconstructed DIEP flaps. Indirect heating caused a significant increase of blood flow in both DIEPflaps and control breasts, and all patients regained some sensation of touch, cold and warmth.Surgery time and complication rates were studied in 64 patients randomized to preoperative mapping ofperforators with computer tomography angiography (CTA) or hand-held Doppler ultrasound (US) prior to DIEPsurgery. Surgery time and complication rates were nearly the same in the two groups.We studied 301 charts of patients with DIEP flap reconstructions to elucidate the impact of smoking habits andBody mass index (BMI) on complication rates. We discovered a significantly increased rate of donor sitecomplications in former smokers but differences in BMI did not make a significant difference in complications.Fifty patients were studied to assess early differences in health care consumption and complication rates followingdelayed breast reconstruction in non-irradiated women with DIEP flap or EP. DIEP reconstruction was a morecomplex and more health care consuming operation compared to EP surgery, which was often an easier solutionfrom the start. In summary, a DIEP flap reconstruction has its advantages and these might be even more obviousin the long run when aspects of patient satisfaction and quality of life can be observed.