Minimal impact of maternal intravenous immunoglobulin infusion on cell-free DNA sequencing for fetal aneuploidy

医学 妊娠期 胎儿游离DNA 怀孕 胎儿 静脉免疫球蛋白治疗 血液取样 产科 非整倍体 抗体 产前诊断 内科学 免疫学 化学 生物 基因 遗传学 生物化学 染色体
作者
Lisa Hui,Mark D. Pertile,Meredith Tassone,Damien L. Bruno
出处
期刊:Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology [Wiley]
卷期号:48 (2): 250-250 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1002/uog.15803
摘要

A range of maternal factors are known to influence the performance of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening for aneuploidy, including autoimmune disease1, treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin2, maternal weight3 and maternal malignancy4. We reported previously our experience of repeated failed cfDNA screening in a woman with severe autoimmune disease and low fetal fraction5. In that report, our serial samples suggested that intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy caused increased variance in cfDNA counts, leading to a failed cfDNA result. We now report our subsequent experience of cfDNA screening in a healthy pregnant woman receiving weekly IVIG therapy for a fetal indication of prior history of a newborn affected by alloimmune thrombocytopenia. A 36-year-old pregnant woman, gravida 6 para 2, had previously undergone cfDNA screening at 10 weeks' gestation with a whole-genome massively parallel sequencing assay (PerceptTM prenatal test, Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia) as part of her routine obstetric care. She received a low-risk result for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 in a male fetus. The fetal fraction of cfDNA in the maternal plasma was 12.4% and maternal body mass index was 27.6 kg/m2. Clinically indicated weekly IVIG infusions were administered from 20 weeks' gestation for prevention of neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia. We obtained ethical approval and patient consent to perform repeat blood sampling before and after IVIG infusion to investigate its effect on cfDNA testing and quality control metrics. At 29 weeks' gestation, 10 mL of maternal peripheral venous blood was collected in a StreckTM DNA blood collection tube just prior to a 75-g IVIG infusion. A repeat sample was taken at the end of the infusion, 6 h later. Both samples were sent to the clinical laboratory that performed the 10-week cfDNA test. The laboratory staff were not blinded to the research samples but adhered to the routine clinical workflow for prenatal screening samples. Plasma isolation, cfDNA extraction, library preparation and sequencing batch run were performed on pre- and post-IVIG samples simultaneously. Both samples returned low-risk results for trisomies 21, 18 and 13, and identified a male fetus. Fetal fractions in the pre- and post-IVIG samples were 17.0% and 20.9%, respectively. Aside from an observed three-fold increase in library concentration after IVIG, there was little difference in the quality control metrics between the two samples. The chromosome-wide variation in read counts (i.e. a measure of the sample- or library-level noise) showed no discernible difference between any of the samples tested. This case demonstrates that IVIG in itself does not appear to adversely affect the performance of cfDNA screening in healthy women with a satisfactory fetal fraction. The adverse effect of IVIG noted in our prior case5 may have been due the borderline acceptable fetal fraction (4.6%) prior to IVIG infusion, differences in the type of cfDNA assay (chromosome selective vs whole genome) and the presence of severe autoimmune disease. Our negative finding adds to the accumulating literature on the influence of maternal factors on cfDNA screening and may assist clinicians in pretest counseling of pregnant women receiving IVIG. L. Hui*†‡§, M. Pertile¶**, M. Tassone†† and D. Bruno¶‡‡ †Perinatal Medicine, Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia; ‡Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; §Public Health Genetics, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia; ¶Cytogenetics, Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Parkville, VIC, Australia; **Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; ††Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mercy Hospital for Women, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia; ‡‡Translational Genomics Unit, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia *Correspondence. (e-mail: lisahui77@gmail.com)
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
无花果应助zz采纳,获得10
1秒前
迷人的念薇完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
Shelley发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
1秒前
兵王应助温暖伟祺采纳,获得10
1秒前
zqxu发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
oylc完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
柠檬忌324完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
等待香薇完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
hutao完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
仁爱翠芙完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
纪乐姗发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
snowy_owl发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
无聊的友灵完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
Moon发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
8秒前
科研通AI6.2应助zoe采纳,获得10
8秒前
淡定从霜发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
qizhixu发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
图喵喵完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
搜集达人应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
传奇3应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
我是老大应助ppsweek采纳,获得10
9秒前
知名完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
9秒前
思源应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
Owen应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
隐形曼青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
Owen应助xuqian采纳,获得30
10秒前
科研通AI6.2应助盒盒怪采纳,获得30
10秒前
Hello应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
科研通AI6.4应助盒盒怪采纳,获得10
10秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Principles of town planning: translating concepts to applications 1000
内視鏡的に摘除しえた十二指腸乳頭部腫瘍の2例 660
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
Interpolation and Regression Models for the Chemical Engineer: Solving Numerical Problems 400
The Neuroscience of Language 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7687110
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9250182
关于积分的说明 19961469
捐赠科研通 7260139
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3289721
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2446647
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2294249