Functional Gait Assessment and Balance Evaluation System Test: Reliability, Validity, Sensitivity, and Specificity for Identifying Individuals With Parkinson Disease Who Fall

伯格天平 组内相关 步态 平衡(能力) 等级间信度 物理医学与康复 切断 可靠性(半导体) 接收机工作特性 帕金森病 物理疗法 结构效度 相关性 内部评级可靠性 心理学 医学 心理测量学 评定量表 疾病 内科学 发展心理学 数学 物理 功率(物理) 量子力学 几何学
作者
Abigail L. Leddy,Beth E. Crowner,Gammon M. Earhart
出处
期刊:Physical therapy [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:91 (1): 102-113 被引量:263
标识
DOI:10.2522/ptj.20100113
摘要

Background Gait impairments, balance impairments, and falls are prevalent in individuals with Parkinson disease (PD). Although the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) can be considered the reference standard for the determination of fall risk, it has a noted ceiling effect. Development of ceiling-free measures that can assess balance and are good at discriminating “fallers” from “nonfallers” is needed. Objective The purpose of this study was to compare the Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) and the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) with the BBS among individuals with PD and evaluate the tests' reliability, validity, and discriminatory sensitivity and specificity for fallers versus nonfallers. Design This was an observational study of community-dwelling individuals with idiopathic PD. Methods The BBS, FGA, and BESTest were administered to 80 individuals with PD. Interrater reliability (n=15) was assessed by 3 raters. Test-retest reliability was based on 2 tests of participants (n=24), 2 weeks apart. Intraclass correlation coefficients (2,1) were used to calculate reliability, and Spearman correlation coefficients were used to assess validity. Cutoff points, sensitivity, and specificity were based on receiver operating characteristic plots. Results Test-retest reliability was .80 for the BBS, .91 for the FGA, and .88 for the BESTest. Interrater reliability was greater than .93 for all 3 tests. The FGA and BESTest were correlated with the BBS (r=.78 and r=.87, respectively). Cutoff scores to identify fallers were 47/56 for the BBS, 15/30 for the FGA, and 69% for the BESTest. The overall accuracy (area under the curve) for the BBS, FGA, and BESTest was .79, .80, and .85, respectively. Limitations Fall reports were retrospective. Conclusion Both the FGA and the BESTest have reliability and validity for assessing balance in individuals with PD. The BESTest is most sensitive for identifying fallers.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
聪慧雪糕完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
christy发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
何永森发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
2秒前
3秒前
xly应助Lny采纳,获得20
3秒前
思源应助jingyuemingqiu采纳,获得10
3秒前
5秒前
5秒前
独特亦旋发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
www发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
hope完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
明亮冰枫应助燕儿采纳,获得10
7秒前
吸吸灵光气完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
何永森完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
keyanzhai完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
WHITE发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
www完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
兔子先生发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
12秒前
风枞完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
执着乐双完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
14秒前
Lucas应助此时此刻采纳,获得10
14秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
xxx发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
领导范儿应助shellyAPTX4869采纳,获得10
16秒前
李健的小迷弟应助wcli采纳,获得10
16秒前
Akim应助聪明的破茧采纳,获得10
16秒前
lu完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
18秒前
积极从蕾应助CQMZY_2025采纳,获得10
18秒前
march发布了新的文献求助30
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science Reference Third edition 6000
Encyclopedia of Forensic and Legal Medicine Third Edition 5000
Agyptische Geschichte der 21.30. Dynastie 2000
Variants in Economic Theory 1000
Global Ingredients & Formulations Guide 2014, Hardcover 1000
Research for Social Workers 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5814313
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5916070
关于积分的说明 15539683
捐赠科研通 4937278
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2658970
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1605267
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1559942