Functional Gait Assessment and Balance Evaluation System Test: Reliability, Validity, Sensitivity, and Specificity for Identifying Individuals With Parkinson Disease Who Fall

伯格天平 组内相关 步态 平衡(能力) 等级间信度 物理医学与康复 切断 可靠性(半导体) 接收机工作特性 帕金森病 物理疗法 结构效度 相关性 内部评级可靠性 心理学 医学 心理测量学 评定量表 疾病 内科学 发展心理学 数学 物理 功率(物理) 量子力学 几何学
作者
Abigail L. Leddy,Beth E. Crowner,Gammon M. Earhart
出处
期刊:Physical therapy [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:91 (1): 102-113 被引量:263
标识
DOI:10.2522/ptj.20100113
摘要

Background Gait impairments, balance impairments, and falls are prevalent in individuals with Parkinson disease (PD). Although the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) can be considered the reference standard for the determination of fall risk, it has a noted ceiling effect. Development of ceiling-free measures that can assess balance and are good at discriminating “fallers” from “nonfallers” is needed. Objective The purpose of this study was to compare the Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) and the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) with the BBS among individuals with PD and evaluate the tests' reliability, validity, and discriminatory sensitivity and specificity for fallers versus nonfallers. Design This was an observational study of community-dwelling individuals with idiopathic PD. Methods The BBS, FGA, and BESTest were administered to 80 individuals with PD. Interrater reliability (n=15) was assessed by 3 raters. Test-retest reliability was based on 2 tests of participants (n=24), 2 weeks apart. Intraclass correlation coefficients (2,1) were used to calculate reliability, and Spearman correlation coefficients were used to assess validity. Cutoff points, sensitivity, and specificity were based on receiver operating characteristic plots. Results Test-retest reliability was .80 for the BBS, .91 for the FGA, and .88 for the BESTest. Interrater reliability was greater than .93 for all 3 tests. The FGA and BESTest were correlated with the BBS (r=.78 and r=.87, respectively). Cutoff scores to identify fallers were 47/56 for the BBS, 15/30 for the FGA, and 69% for the BESTest. The overall accuracy (area under the curve) for the BBS, FGA, and BESTest was .79, .80, and .85, respectively. Limitations Fall reports were retrospective. Conclusion Both the FGA and the BESTest have reliability and validity for assessing balance in individuals with PD. The BESTest is most sensitive for identifying fallers.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
唠叨的白萱完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
优秀少年完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
小橙子发布了新的文献求助100
1秒前
1秒前
4秒前
sswaggyc完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
万能图书馆应助沉默凌波采纳,获得10
4秒前
优秀少年发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
俭朴书瑶发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
7秒前
laogao完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
9秒前
10秒前
12秒前
渊思发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
DUANYALI发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
沉默凌波发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
ccm应助goodsheep采纳,获得10
16秒前
JamesPei应助俭朴书瑶采纳,获得10
18秒前
鸿任发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
Echo发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
万能图书馆应助小瑜儿采纳,获得10
21秒前
hhhh发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
上官若男应助alden采纳,获得10
21秒前
勤奋的闭月完成签到,获得积分10
22秒前
英姑应助dent强采纳,获得10
25秒前
陈住气完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
29秒前
hhhh完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
31秒前
丁丁猫老大完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
33秒前
丘比特应助DUANYALI采纳,获得10
34秒前
Lucas应助LHZ采纳,获得10
36秒前
基莲发布了新的文献求助10
38秒前
40秒前
nyzcc发布了新的文献求助10
40秒前
changfox完成签到,获得积分10
43秒前
alden发布了新的文献求助10
45秒前
高分求助中
请在求助之前详细阅读求助说明!!!! 20000
One Man Talking: Selected Essays of Shao Xunmei, 1929–1939 1000
The Three Stars Each: The Astrolabes and Related Texts 900
Yuwu Song, Biographical Dictionary of the People's Republic of China 800
Multifunctional Agriculture, A New Paradigm for European Agriculture and Rural Development 600
Bernd Ziesemer - Maos deutscher Topagent: Wie China die Bundesrepublik eroberte 500
A radiographic standard of reference for the growing knee 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 有机化学 工程类 生物化学 纳米技术 物理 内科学 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 电极 光电子学 量子力学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 2476859
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2140740
关于积分的说明 5456449
捐赠科研通 1864113
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 926676
版权声明 562846
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 495824