杜拉鲁肽
利拉鲁肽
医学
安慰剂
临床终点
2型糖尿病
内科学
艾塞那肽
恶心
胃肠病学
不利影响
随机对照试验
内分泌学
糖尿病
替代医学
病理
作者
Masato Odawara,Jun‐ichiro Miyagawa,Noriyuki Iwamoto,Yasushi Takita,Takeshi Imaoka,Toshinari Takamura
摘要
Aims To examine the efficacy and safety of once‐weekly dulaglutide 0.75 mg monotherapy compared with once‐daily liraglutide 0.9 mg in J apanese patients with type 2 diabetes ( T2D ) for 52 weeks. Methods We conducted a phase III , randomized, 52‐week (26‐week primary endpoint), active‐ and placebo‐controlled trial comparing 492 J apanese patients (dulaglutide, n = 281; liraglutide, n = 141; and placebo, n = 70). Participants and investigators were blinded to treatment assignment for dulaglutide and placebo but not for liraglutide (open‐label comparator); after 26 weeks, patients randomized to placebo were switched to once‐weekly dulaglutide 0.75 mg (open‐label). The present paper reports results for patients treated with dulaglutide and patients treated with liraglutide for 52 weeks. Results At week 52, dulaglutide decreased HbA1c significantly from baseline compared with liraglutide [least squares mean difference: −0.20; 95% confidence interval ( CI ) −0.39, −0.01; p = 0.04]. At week 52 (last observation carried forward), dulaglutide significantly decreased pre‐ and post‐dinner blood glucose ( BG ) levels, the mean of seven‐point self‐monitored BG profiles, the mean of all postprandial BG levels and circadian variation compared with liraglutide. Body weight was generally stable in both groups through 52 weeks. The most frequently reported adverse events were nasopharyngitis, constipation, nausea and diarrhoea. Eight dulaglutide‐treated (2.9%) and four liraglutide‐treated (2.9%) patients reported hypoglycaemia, with no event being severe. Conclusions Monotherapy with once‐weekly dulaglutide 0.75 mg was effective and safe in J apanese patients with T2D , with better glycaemic control compared with once‐daily liraglutide 0.9 mg.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI