后囊膜混浊
包膜切开术
人工晶状体
医学
眼科
人工晶状体
假性白内障
胶囊
白内障手术
超声乳化术
视力
生物
植物
作者
Miro Kalauz,Sanja Masnec,Rajko Kordić,Tomislav Kuzman,Sania Vidas Pauk,Ivan Škegro,Sonja Jandroković,Sanja Perić
标识
DOI:10.1080/08820538.2016.1247182
摘要
To compare the incidence and intensity of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) between two intraocular lenses (IOLs) over three years.Eighty-three patients underwent cataract surgery with implantation of Acreos Adapt AO or Acrysof SA60AT. PCO values were assessed using a photographic image analysis system (EPCO 2000) and the amount of PCO at the slit lamp.Mean PCO score was 2.78 ± 1.55 for the Acreos Adapt AO and 2.32 ± 1.20 for the Acrysof SA60AT (P=.229). There were no significant differences in the median EPCO values in the entire IOL optics area (0.60 ± 0.26 vs 0.58 ± 0.23; P=.745) and in the central 3-mm zone (0.28 ± 0.13 vs 0.27 ± 0.12; P=.638). Neodymium:YAG capsulotomy was performed in 28% of eyes with Acreos Adapt AO and 23.33% with Acrysof SA60AT (P=.692).Both IOLs had comparable PCO and Nd:YAG rates three years postoperatively.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI