贴现
概化理论
心理学
延迟贴现
认知心理学
心理信息
任务(项目管理)
透视图(图形)
时间贴现
提示语
跨期选择
时间范围
社会心理学
意识的神经相关物
发展心理学
认知
冲动性
神经科学
计算机科学
经济
法学
梅德林
管理
人工智能
政治学
财务
作者
Jillian M. Rung,Gregory J. Madden
摘要
Episodic future thinking (EFT), or imagining experiencing one's future, reduces discounting of future rewards, but the mechanisms of this effect are unclear. We examined the role of cues to engage in EFT, possible demand characteristics inherent to those cues (prompting awareness of the hypothesized effects of EFT), and changes in temporal horizon (how far one thinks into the future) in these reductions in delay discounting. In Experiment 1, cues prompting participants to engage in EFT during the discounting task were presented or withheld: EFT decreased discounting only when cues were present. In a time-perspective task in which cues were not presented, EFT did not broaden temporal horizon; however, episodic recent thinking (the putative control activity) shortened temporal horizons. In Experiment 2, cues were manipulated in a way designed to make them either more theoretically relevant (prompting episodic thought) or more prone to demand characteristics (prompting attention to the correspondence in delays between EFT and discounting tasks). Only theoretically relevant cues reduced delay discounting. These results do not support the hypothesis that EFT reduces delay discounting because of demand characteristics. Instead, they suggest limitations on the generalizability of EFT effects in uncued contexts and suggest that mechanisms other than temporal horizon may be responsible for its effects. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI