二甲双胍
赛马鲁肽
医学
析因分析
危险系数
狼牙棒
内科学
2型糖尿病
子群分析
磷酸西他列汀
安慰剂
利西塞纳泰德
糖尿病
置信区间
内分泌学
利拉鲁肽
胰岛素
心肌梗塞
替代医学
病理
传统PCI
作者
Mansoor Husain,Agostino Consoli,Alessandra De Remigis,Anna Sina P. Meyer,Søren Rasmussen,Stephen C. Bain
标识
DOI:10.1186/s12933-022-01489-6
摘要
Cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) are conducted on a background of standard of care including metformin. These analyses sought to determine whether the cardiovascular (CV) effects of semaglutide and other glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) vary according to baseline metformin use.A post hoc analysis was conducted using pooled SUSTAIN 6 and PIONEER 6 CVOT data in subjects with and without metformin use at baseline. Additionally, a trial-level meta-analysis was conducted using data from seven CVOTs with GLP-1RAs-SUSTAIN 6, PIONEER 6, HARMONY OUTCOMES, LEADER, REWIND, EXSCEL and AMPLITUDE-O-including adults with type 2 diabetes at high CV risk, and a primary endpoint of time to first major adverse CV event (MACE).In the post hoc analysis, the no-metformin subgroup was older, with a higher body mass index, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate and higher CV risk at baseline vs the metformin subgroup. Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for the reduction in risk of MACE with semaglutide vs placebo in the metformin and no-metformin subgroups were 0.70 (0.55;0.89) and 0.86 (0.60;1.22), respectively. No significant interaction between the treatment effect on MACE and metformin subgroup was observed. Findings for other CV endpoints were similar. In the meta-analysis, treatment effect (GLP-1RA vs placebo) on CV outcomes was no different with vs without baseline metformin (overall ratio between the hazard ratios for metformin vs no-metformin 1.09 [0.96;1.22]).These findings indicate that the CV outcomes for semaglutide were similar regardless of baseline metformin use, which may also apply to all GLP-1RAs. Trial registration SUSTAIN 6 (NCT01720446), PIONEER 6 (NCT02692716).
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI