消毒剂
鼻病毒
洗手
病毒
洗手液
洗手
乙醇
酒
微生物学
医学
拓本
病毒学
化学
食品科学
色谱法
卫生用品
生物
有机化学
病理
作者
Carita Savolainen‐Kopra,Terttu Korpela,Marja‐Leena Simonen‐Tikka,Ali Amiryousefi,Thedi Ziegler,Merja Roivainen,Tapani Hovi
摘要
Abstract Ethanol‐containing hand rubs are used frequently as a substitute for hand washing with water and soap. However, not all viruses are inactivated by a short term rubbing with alcohol. The capacity of a single round of instructed and controlled hand cleaning with water and soap or ethanol‐containing hand rub, respectively, was tested for removal of human rhinovirus administered onto the skin of healthy volunteers on the back of the hands. Hand washing with soap and water appeared to be much more efficient for removing rhinoviruses from skin than rubbing hands with an ethanol‐containing disinfectant. After washing with soap and water the virus was detected in 3/9 (33.3%) test persons from the left hand and 1/9 (11.1%) cases from the right hand, whereas the virus was detected invariably by real‐time RT‐PCR from both hands after cleaning with alcohol hand rub ( P ‐value <0.01). Both substances evaluated clinically were also tested in vitro for virucidal efficacy against Human rhinovirus2 (HRV2) using a standardized assay. Both tested substances were poor within the contact time used in the hand‐cleaning test. In conclusion, thorough and conventional hand washing with water and soap can clean efficiently hands contaminated with the virus responsible for an extensive share of common cold episodes. J. Med. Virol. 84:543–547, 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI