Procedural pain assessment in neonates at risk of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome: a scoping review protocol

奇纳 医学 梅德林 类阿片 背景(考古学) 疼痛评估 协议(科学) 重症监护医学 麻醉 疼痛管理 替代医学 内科学 精神科 心理干预 受体 法学 古生物学 病理 生物 政治学
作者
Julianna Lavergne,Erin Langman,Deborah Mansell,Justine Dol,Claire West,Britney Benoit
出处
期刊:JBI evidence synthesis [Joanna Briggs Institute]
卷期号:21 (10): 2107-2114 被引量:4
标识
DOI:10.11124/jbies-22-00414
摘要

Objective: The objective of this review is to identify evidence on pain assessment during acute procedures in hospitalized neonates at risk of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS). Introduction: While all neonates are routinely exposed to various painful procedures, neonates at risk of NOWS have longer hospital stays and are exposed to multiple painful procedures. NOWS occurs when a neonate is born to a birth parent who identifies as having sustained opioid use (such as morphine or methadone) during pregnancy. Accurate pain assessment and management during painful procedures is critical for minimizing the well-documented adverse effects of unmanaged pain in neonates. While pain indicators and composite pain scores are valid and reliable for healthy neonates, there is no review of evidence regarding procedural pain assessment in neonates at risk of NOWS. Inclusion criteria: Eligible studies will include those reporting on hospitalized pre-term and full-term neonates at risk of NOWS having pain assessments (ie, behavioral indicators, physiological indicators, validated composite pain scores) during and/or after exposure to an acute painful procedure. Methods: This review will follow the JBI scoping review methodology. Databases to be searched will include MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), Embase, PsyclNFO (EBSCO), and Scopus. The relevant data will be extracted by 2 reviewers using a modified JBI extraction tool. The results will be summarized in narrative and tabular format, including the components of participants, concept, and context (PCC). Review registration: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/fka8s.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
孟雯毓发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
tianzhen完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
谦让的牛排完成签到 ,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
SSY完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
zl完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
张zh完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
靓丽的傲芙完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
袁不评发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
3秒前
董小李完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
刘肥肥完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
飘逸怜菡发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
大意的傻春完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
桐桐应助Luna采纳,获得10
5秒前
6秒前
zhang发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
8秒前
信仰完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
8秒前
Maestro_S应助害羞的凡霜采纳,获得10
9秒前
10秒前
星辰大海应助youzhi315采纳,获得10
10秒前
11秒前
认真的冬易完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
Jue驳回了bkagyin应助
12秒前
周周没烦恼完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
13秒前
黑黑黑完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
14秒前
聪慧冰淇淋完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
小徐同志完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
15秒前
完美世界应助猪猪hero采纳,获得10
15秒前
阿尼完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
和谐的幻香完成签到,获得积分20
16秒前
高分求助中
Encyclopedia of Quaternary Science Third edition 2025 12000
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Social Work Ethics Casebook: Cases and Commentary (revised 2nd ed.). Frederic G. Reamer 800
Beyond the sentence : discourse and sentential form / edited by Jessica R. Wirth 600
Holistic Discourse Analysis 600
Vertébrés continentaux du Crétacé supérieur de Provence (Sud-Est de la France) 600
Reliability Monitoring Program 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5339366
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4476236
关于积分的说明 13930768
捐赠科研通 4371637
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2402047
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1394975
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1366898