头戴式耳机
虚拟现实
模拟病
光学头戴式显示器
考试(生物学)
前庭系统
情感(语言学)
模拟
物理医学与康复
心理学
计算机科学
听力学
医学
计算机视觉
人机交互
沟通
电信
古生物学
生物
作者
Fazíl Necdet Ardıç,Ulaş Metin,Betül Ebrar Gökcan
标识
DOI:10.1080/00016489.2023.2238769
摘要
Background 3D Virtual Reality (VR) offers new opportunities in vestibular science. It also presents new challenges and problems.Aims/objectives The study aimed to evaluate the effective factors in the 3D VR Subjective Visual Vertical (SVV) test and the impact of cybersickness on the test results.Material and methods The effect of the foam surface, head position in the yaw axis, moving background, and arm position holding the controller was tested. Cybersickness was evaluated using the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ).Results The head position and controller holding style significantly affected the results. The foam surface and the moving background did not have a significant effect. Although 61.4% of the patients fell into the bad category according to the symptoms of the SSQ score, cybersickness did not significantly affect the SVV results.Conclusions and significance In 3D VR SVV, additional factors should be considered: the headset’s weight, head position, and how we hold the controller. The A-effect emerged when the head was 45 degrees turned on the yaw axis. A significant shift was detected in the test, with the arm holding the controller at 90 degrees. Most subjects felt cybersickness at a considerable level. Cybersickness should always be taken into account in VR when planning new applications.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI